Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenSmoke85
I was refering to your statement on the Phils this year.
right, you should read slower because I was referring to the 2009 Phils. The reference to this year's Phils was a different part of the sentence.
Now, if you're ESL, I said the following:
'
Again, the Phils -2.5 system is
still better!'
The 'Again' means I was saying the Phils -2.5
was better in the original posts 2 yeas ago, and the 'still' means it is better today. Don't worry, most people in this forum can't understand simple Engrish, but this is the 2nd time you've misunderstood something obvious.
2009 was being compared to 2009, only a n00b would fail to see an apples-to-apples comparison.
Because if you go back and look at the original posts, you'll see my 2-yr old posts pointing out when the Phils -2.5 system was better than the Rangers -2.5 system. All you have to do is click on page 1 to read them, it's not that complicated. Enjoy!