I know you guys have seen/heard it all and I know I must be mising something here but can someone just set me straight on how I am thinking about this incorrectly (ie if something seems too basic/good you have to be missing something)?
If you can get a parlay at 2.6, i.e. risk 50 to win 130, what is wrong with the following (just assume Cincy -4 is a good play for the example):
Place two parlays:
1. Cincy -4 & Chi -3.5, 50 to win 130
2. Cincy -4 & Chi +3.5, 50 to win 130
Not only that, but if Cincy ties (wins by 4), you'll lose money as both parlays will reduce to straight bets and the one that wins will pay less than 50.
Compared to a straight bet push which of course you break even.