NFL Survivor Picks - Page 19 - Sports Betting - SportsBetting Strategy and Forum

I actually think I'm going to save NO for later, wayyy later.

I'm goin to let the week playout for a bit but I have a prediction that is certainly 150% going to go against the KISS rules that I doubt any of you want to follow me on.

Jets?

Quote

09-27-2010 , 11:29 PM

#453

kdog

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 3,864

Quote:

Originally Posted by True North

What about Atlanta? Niners are horrible and the Falcons don't have a lot of future value.

I would be careful with this one. Niners are better than they have shown so far and are pretty much playing for their season here.

Quote

09-27-2010 , 11:35 PM

#454

canabiz

journeyman

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 228

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royle Bluntson

Should we be worried about Cleveland and them possibly having a run game now with Hillis?

Are you considering Cincy? They do play Buffalo and Cleveland at home later on.

Quote

09-27-2010 , 11:41 PM

#455

MacGuyV

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 22,298

Quote:

Originally Posted by mulebennett

Jets?

No?

Quote

09-28-2010 , 11:18 PM

#456

▬▬▬▬▬▬

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 5,007

thinking of going GB with both picks again this week while everybody loads up on NO

picking 2 for week 5 looks really tough

Quote

09-29-2010 , 12:18 AM

#457

Royle Bluntson

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 3,075

Quote:

Originally Posted by canabiz

Are you considering Cincy? They do play Buffalo and Cleveland at home later on.

no im actually thinking about the eagles...

lol, ****..guess I found 2. Oh well, I'm rollin the dice with Indy this week.
Away vs a division rival. I don't care, Jag's secondary is the worst in the league and playing away doesn't phase Peyton.

Might double gamble it up and pick the Eagles for my $20 and Indy for my bigger $ pool.

Last edited by Royle Bluntson; 09-29-2010 at 12:26 AM.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 12:28 AM

#458

Royle Bluntson

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 3,075

Week 5 is sketch, a lot of people will be goin with Indy just bc of KC but they are undefeated right now and gona be coming off the bye.

right now I'm look at ATL @ Cleveland for week 5

Quote

09-29-2010 , 02:09 AM

#459

2J4U

veteran

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,555

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royle Bluntson

I actually think I'm going to save NO for later, wayyy later.

Like, after they've locked up the division? Use 'em while they need to win. Too many variables late in the season to worry about it now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kdog

I would be careful with this one. Niners are better than they have shown so far and are pretty much playing for their season here.

This.

Any reason I shouldn't like Houston this week? I've used NOS, GBP, and BAL.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 02:24 AM

#460

chucky

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,998

Quote:

Originally Posted by kdog

I would be careful with this one. Niners are better than they have shown so far and are pretty much playing for their season here.

Like they werent playing for the season at 0-2 facing kansas city.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 02:25 AM

#461

chucky

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,998

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2J4U

Like, after they've locked up the division? Use 'em while they need to win. Too many variables late in the season to worry about it now.

This.

Any reason I shouldn't like Houston this week? I've used NOS, GBP, and BAL.

on the road against a team that has looked decent with its current qb. also houston may not have andre johnson.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 02:31 AM

#462

2J4U

veteran

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,555

KC is starting to look legitimate though.

Hm, good call. Need to give it more thought. Weird week.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 08:21 AM

#463

PropPlayer

Sports Betting Mod

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 3,798

I'm considering the Eagles this week too.
I'm sure its bad strategy saving for week 13, but if I don't use Packers this week that's probably where I'd use them.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 08:31 AM

#464

27offsuit

actions have consequences!

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 38,530

talking about week 13 in week 4 is hahahahahahhahaha

Quote

09-29-2010 , 11:11 AM

#465

2J4U

veteran

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,555

Quote:

Originally Posted by PropPlayer

I'm considering the Eagles this week too.
I'm sure its bad strategy saving for week 13, but if I don't use Packers this week that's probably where I'd use them.

Then use them this week.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 12:57 PM

#466

Royle Bluntson

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 3,075

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2J4U

Like, after they've locked up the division? Use 'em while they need to win. Too many variables late in the season to worry about it now.

Actually would save them for Week 14 but saying they won't be playing there asses off every week is dumb, they are going to be playing for home field advantage all season

Quote:

Originally Posted by 27offsuit

talking about week 13 in week 4 is hahahahahahhahaha

It's all confidence baby. I planned my whole survivor season out after week 1.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 01:05 PM

#467

Royle Bluntson

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 3,075

Quote:

Originally Posted by PropPlayer

I'm considering the Eagles this week too.
I'm sure its bad strategy saving for week 13, but if I don't use Packers this week that's probably where I'd use them.

Eagles traded McNabb within the division because the advantage of knowing what McNabb does far exceeds McNabb's knowledge of the Eagles offense, which btw is completely **** anyway now that Vick is starting.

Eagles are a far better team with Bradley in at linebacker and there is no question McNabb will see a million blitzes all day.

There the 2nd worst pass defense in the league right now. It's a pretty lopsided matchup. I think I'm pickin the birds.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 02:07 PM

#468

Rococo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 18,086

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royle Bluntson

In a superdeep pool (one of mine is 3000 plus), I think that the Eagles are the correct play this week, especially if you assume that you will have to make it through week 17 (or very close) to win. There are very few good spots in which to take the Eagles. This is the week imo.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 04:58 PM

#469

canabiz

journeyman

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 228

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rococo

In a superdeep pool (one of mine is 3000 plus), I think that the Eagles are the correct play this week, especially if you assume that you will have to make it through week 17 (or very close) to win. There are very few good spots in which to take the Eagles. This is the week imo.

I suggested the Eagles in Week 2 when they played Detroit and people laughed at me.

Some of them probably took Dallas in that week, trying to be cute and all, and look who is laughing now.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 07:19 PM

#470

shipontilt

self-banned

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 12,209

Quote:

Originally Posted by mulebennett

Jets?

Do NOT take the Jets this week.

Quote

09-29-2010 , 10:54 PM

#471

kdog

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 3,864

Quote:

Originally Posted by chucky

Like they werent playing for the season at 0-2 facing kansas city.

An 0-3 start in a division with Arizona, Seattle and the Rams is surmountable. 0-4 is a lot tougher, particularly if Seattle beats the Rams on Sunday.

Quote

09-30-2010 , 12:25 AM

#472

tiltymcfish0

veteran

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,210

I'm so ABC so far it's nitworthy, have taken the highest ML fav three times to start. Only 19 left in my pool but I've seen some very interesting picks so far. Naturally, I have already burned GB so that's out.

Unfortunately, only 1/19 has burned the Saints; however, I can't help but think at least 5-10 others in this group will be all about "I want to save NO for later (later, of course, usually means some point in the future where you've long since been knocked out of the pool

So I'll continue to KISS/bore myself to death in week 4. Go Saints.

Quote

09-30-2010 , 12:58 AM

#473

shipontilt

self-banned

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 12,209

I'm going with Hot Lanta

Quote

09-30-2010 , 06:45 AM

#474

True North

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 23,703

I'm looking for someone besides New Orleans. Three weeks in a row picking the runaway public team can't be a very good idea, plus they have the highest future value of any team out there.

The Chargers are starting to look like a pretty good pick.