Quote:
Originally Posted by elliot10181
Breakdown of why Machida's good at -250 owed by Just-mo
For me this fight is a total no bet. Machida is the better fighter physically and skillwise, but judges can see even less straight when it comes to this guy than your average fighter, so I'm certainly done laying any kind of juice on him.
On the other hand though, how can you ever trust Mousasi to take a 5 round decision from somebody? You can't, not if you're sane, so I do understand a small bet on ITD but I wouldn't be bothered to bet anything else. Then again, this is a guy who couldn't finish Lofa Tatupu or whatever the guy's name was. Faded badly against Jardine/OSP.
Mousasi backers, ask yourselves this...when was the last time he looked impressive against a quality fighter? I don't know what my answer would be, but I'm pretty sure Mike Kyle doesn't count. 29-28 against a wet behind the ears OSP certainly doesn't count. Jardine? Yes that fight was a whitewash but 2 wins in his last 10. If we're being honest, your answer would probably have to be Sokoudjou or Babalu, as they were still considered competitive fighters when Mousasi blew them out (Babalu won his next against Lawler). That was in 2009, folks.
Could the striking be close? Absolutely, but only for a couple of rounds. We all know what's gonna happen to Mousasi after 10 minutes. Maybe that will be enough to win a decision, I mean Phil Davis won like 60s of the fight against Machida and they shipped him the win so 10 minutes should be more than enough.
Honestly, I love watching the guy fight because he has a tantalizing skillset, but Mousasi is a fighter who just doesn't seem to take his career that seriously, which is incredibly disappointing. But 40 fights into his career and he still hasn't proven he can look good past 10 minutes? That's a little bit embarrassing, and the only reasonable explanation is that he doesn't take his training seriously.
In conclusion, -250 seems like a pretty fair line.