Quote:
Originally Posted by JimGunn
The GDR decision I can understand. Anderson, that was a straight up robbery.
Which two rounds were clear for Brunson, 1 and 3? Or is my opinion of round 2 (which some media scored 10-10 for some reason and others gave to Brunson) way off? I thought r2 was close but clear Anderson, r1 was close (Anderson won more of the round, but Brunson landed the best flurry of the round from the clinch) and r3 was close but clear Brunson
I kinda get it with the 3 bonuses, there was no other standout performer in an exciting fight and only the one finish, so the one good fight gets FOTN and the one good performance gets POTN and then what? I guess you could give it to GDR for winning the title, but I mean she punched her opponent after the bell twice and the decision was close, then Anderson won, but via questionable decision in a fight that wasn't amazing, then Jacare, Miller and Poirier all already got a bonus and it's not like Poirier's win was so fantastic he needs a second bonus for POTN
If they make it up by giving 5 bonuses on a card where there are a ton of good performances i'd be fine with it