Quote:
Originally Posted by Soxxy
Well you obviously are not an expert because you are just straight wrong. That is basically how Jeff Horn just beat Pacquiao. He won the fight because of his ring generalship and effective aggression while landing less punches. It is the exact type of fight that because most people don't understand the judging criteria call the decision a robbery and cry about how corrupt boxing is. Boxing is not a sport of just landing punches.
Agree that it's not just about landing punches. If conor can manage to throw a lot of punches then yeah he might win a round. Horn was the agressor cause he threw more puches than pacquiao so you could give him some rounds even tough pacquiao connected more. But my point was he
probably wont be able to throw a lot of punches, and you can't win for effective agression if you dont throw punches.
I'm not saying that mcgregor has 0% chance of winning a round but it's not likely enough to bet it at 2.62.
Quote:
McGregor is totally going to be trying this dirty in fighting style with a ton of arm punches and elbows.
I can't recall 1 time when someone won a round doing that vs mayweather, he instantly grabbed pacquiao and guerrero everytime they were inside. So why would mcgregor would be succesful doing that?
Quote:
Either way it doesn't matter because it is utterly stupid to bet anything other than Floyd to win straight up.
-375 that is so sick.
Don't get cute and outsmart yourself boys.
Amen! Maybe win by ko/tko/dq is good bet too, but win straight up at those odds seem so sick.