Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Low-Content Forum Chatter Archived (May 2016 to Dec 2021) Low-Content Forum Chatter Archived (May 2016 to Dec 2021)

10-22-2016 , 02:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HolidayInTheSun
i'm big on 361
dat steam fade
10-22-2016 , 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny_B
dat steam fade
what do you meannn
10-22-2016 , 04:24 PM
h2 over i akro coul be good. look for a lot of throws
10-22-2016 , 04:52 PM
h2 app st over 24. look for a scorinng explosionn as app st looks to put their enemy down
10-22-2016 , 11:07 PM
1-3-4, -2.15u

sigh, what is the point of even battling against poogs i cant beat the bookie how can i beat him
10-22-2016 , 11:27 PM
bet with me tommy ill book your action. wait i have a great idea. can i crossbook with pogs? i know i will lose going agaist him but it will be a good learninng experience for me
10-23-2016 , 12:18 AM
how di you guys know to bet lsu? i really thought ole miss woul do it
10-23-2016 , 01:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmcarroll33
Unluckyboy is like the guy who gets perma friendzoned but never learns to move on. Just keeps trying over and over and over and over and over. What are we on year 5 year of the same begging for handouts?
I KNOW ITS HARD TO SEE TOMATOE LIKE A HUMAN BEING BUT TRUST ME TOMATOE IS - TOMATOE'S LIKE YOU OR I. WHAT REALLY BOTHERS ME OUT THERE IS TO THINK OF THOSE PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO DON'T SEE TOMATOE AS A PERSON.

LEAVE TOMATOE ALONE.
10-23-2016 , 11:26 AM
-150 favs in pucks win more consistently than -150 favs at any other sport. and yet it's more difficult to predict individual player performance. these things come down to a single goal or assist.

players (shots on goal)
skinner (3) over giroux (3)
stempniak (3) over voracek (6) x
landeskog (1) over trochek (4)
malkin (3) over forsberg (2)
thornton (1) over nielsen (0)
stamkos (4) over hoffman (3) x
brassard (1) over johnson (0)
kadri (1) over toews (1)

we throw out the top and bottom results (trimmed mean) and what do we get.
=================

10 shots vs 10 shots at avg odds of around +103.
10-23-2016 , 12:24 PM
shots on goal is for newbs
10-23-2016 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poogs
shots on goal is for newbs

Lol, you are betting the softest bet there is in sports betting and waiting for 20 games in, let's not pretend to be an expert or anything.
10-23-2016 , 12:51 PM
no poogs is right. it's like using an era statistic when we could be using xfip
10-23-2016 , 12:52 PM
get your titans +2 teasers boys
10-23-2016 , 04:24 PM
is ayone else on pats? i leare that sometime, the public ply, is the sharp play. look for brady to drop over 5 td passes here
10-23-2016 , 07:47 PM
Man, mike tomlin is abysmal
10-24-2016 , 03:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpy64
34-34-136.861
det-1-115 23.125 units
sea u43 2105 units
sf pk 5.69 units
tb u46.5-115 14.205 units
Den u40.5 1.09 units
cards u43 2.105 units
atl-6.5-105 29.504 units
atl o53.5 3.105 units
bills-3+105 7.83 units
jags-1.5-115 5.524 units
eagles+3 5.34 units
eagles+140 3.115 units
Ari-2 9.05 units
Everyone said he was broke,
everyone said the man should stop.
Grumpy can't stop, won't stop.
The man doesn't know the definition of stop. This man just turned NFL sports betting on its head. You've heard of Wong Teasers, get ready for Grumpy Unders. This is it boys. This is why we sample Gibbs baby!



-136.861u on the year to ~+1,968u in a night.





Another million dollar month coming out of 2+2. Now Iowa! isn't the only one.

10-24-2016 , 08:11 AM
Grumpy64 is relentless and has the attention of some of the sharpest people I know. Congrats Grumpy.
10-24-2016 , 03:05 PM
I love grumpy. Heart of a lion.
10-24-2016 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabaneta
Lol, you are betting the softest bet there is in sports betting and waiting for 20 games in, let's not pretend to be an expert or anything.
eh...cant really argue with you here. Honestly anything that I cap myself successfully makes me feel like billy walters. I dont care if its hockey props, it all spends the same.
10-24-2016 , 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poogs
eh...cant really argue with you here. Honestly anything that I cap myself successfully makes me feel like billy walters. I dont care if its hockey props, it all spends the same.
don't worry about it poogs I made a model that crushed hockey props for years in about 30 minutes in excel 10 years ago when I knew nothing about modeling. sadly it was probably the most profitable model i've ever made.
10-24-2016 , 04:16 PM
will not give up till we beat this market. back to the lab
10-24-2016 , 07:48 PM
Just out of interest, does anyone here bet rugby or league?
10-24-2016 , 07:53 PM
$77 sharps have claimed to. But many claim many things.
10-24-2016 , 08:34 PM
lol a $77 sharp aye? I do like guessing games but is the clue to be found in the sports betting subforum? I need to narrow my scope somewhat.
Perhaps a particular thread might help me to uncover this $77 mystery man?
What does he look like and to what social class does he belong? Is he so named because he bets stakes of $77 or because he claims to have profited $77?

Re rugby, i'm surprised there isn't more discussion of it in this forum. It's a pretty easy market to exploit. Admittedly, highrollers will get limited use out of it- i think the max bet on pinnacle is under $2,000 for NZ domestic matches- but it's an ideal market for those starting out.
10-25-2016 , 05:32 PM
yes i realize there is a nhl betting thread but all the good posts are in the chatter thread

tomg total points
okposo +115 over simmonds
stastny -160 over backlund
stempniak +110 over larkin
toffoli -150 over hartnell
hornquist -120 over trochek
parise +100 over marchand

      
m