Quote:
Originally Posted by JPB383
Unclear why Post-Oaks involvement is even relevant???
Red Flags towards what? Do you think this runs deeper than the hacker????? Do you think it could have been FBI CIA DOJ OR MAYBE THE RUSSIANS????????????
wth is wrong with you?
Because he claimed to have lost money in the transaction. I am unclear of what his involvement is, yet he is claiming involvement. He could clarify this by saying "Bruiser and I have a business arrangement." Yet as of not he has not bothered to clarify how he is involved.
Personally, I consider them both completely incompetent and wouldn't trust either to hold any of my funds. If we're going to be using third parties to hold and move money, and extra level of diligence should be performed. Maybe this seems crazy to you as I doubt you really hold any substantial amounts of money for other people. (As in high six figure holdings.) This vetting process is a major part of being able to trust people to do this.
I simply want more information to better understand what actually transpired.
I guess success is what is wrong with me. I operate like a person who doesn't get scammed in easy to avoid ways and want to help understand the mindset of how someone so incompetent could get scammed, and even moreso how someone else could trust this person with their funds. (Or lies about it to get a word in on the conversation with extra validity.)
Prop,
Can you actually check IP history for users or does that not exist? If yes, would there be any reason why you couldn't disclose whether the IPs were the same (or from the same C block)?