Quote:
Originally Posted by AngerPush
You don't have to put cheating in quotes lol. You broke their stated rules then coached me on telling the agent that we didn't use a software bc they could never prove you did. But they did prove it. The bookie used his own software to detect your software, and besides you made it really ****ing obvious bc you're a ****ing idiot. You had this enormous edge that probably could've gone undetected all season, but you decided it was necessary to blast 24 error lines in half of a day's games.
And betting error lines in baseball, especially, is an ENORMOUS edge.
Lmao what?!?!? Bro did you actually just say he cheated the book and broke their rules and you never would have done this if you had known beforehand?! Your entire arrangement breaks the books rules. In fact its you whose most breaking the rules here because its your account(with your friend of all ppl that youre putting in sharp action).
Im editing this bc its late and honestly had no idea really what you were talking about with error lines. Figured that was some random terminology your "friend" used but I now understand it better. It seems that you havent produced anything to back up this claim whereas hes claiming he bets primetime stuff at gametime and live bets. I think its more likely that the book realized the action is sharp and that is what theyre saying is not allowed and youre agreeing with them as if you didnt know thats what was happening. You needed to take the line that its YOU betting, so how could it be sharp as your friend knows youre not a sharp. Seems you folded and let the book scum both of you. Its asinine you're trying to act holier than thou and like this guy is doing some shady scumbaggery that you will not be a part of. Everything about your arrangement is you being a part of it!
However I do think if youre truly getting stiffed by the book then its a wash, unless you explicitly hv'd for all the action. Which would be very brave of you given youre letting the fate of that be in the books hands. However you definitely should have been able to get any bet that was accepted and won paid out. Its very very very rare for a book to void an accepted wager in a situation like this. If they decide action is sharp theyll shut down after the accepted bets are finished. Ive only had one book ever refuse to pay out accepted action(Layne Flack, he didnt like that I talked back to him when he told me my action was sharp and so he cancelled 8 bets).
If I were you I would have taken a very serious line with your "friend" whose booking the action as what hes doing is very scummy. However it seems youve taken his side in this bc he said software was used and thats against the rules. Of course software was used. The bets get placed when the line becomes +ev at any of the books that theyve got action at.
Until you can get specifics on this "error line" thing and the 24 bets I think you really need to get your friend to pay or do some compromise. Or have a very transparent convo that nyc can anon and verify you arent blowing smoke. Blocking him aint it
Last edited by The Standard Station; 07-12-2023 at 08:41 AM.
Reason: I didnt understand what he meant by "error lines" in the context hes saying. He still provides no proof for it though.