Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa!
I have my own, but they aren't much better than what is publicly available. 90% of my DFS risk comes from cash games with 4 or fewer where it doesn't really matter. I only look at them for the big GPPs and to break a tie between otherwise equal players for cash.
I wouldn't bother.
i've often thought about this but haven't committed the time since yahoo gpp contests small with flatter payouts and like you i'm so heavy cash that i've actually won their gpps and lost money overall on same slate (things like hockey/soccer max gpp earnings is like 500 if you sweep - those are my best sports and i regularly get 2k in cash in hockey and 1k in soccer but they just don't have much for gpps beyond a token 2x entry 12 man with 400 people etc)
but I've always assumed:
1. use parameters like all aggregate ownership can't exceed real life (ie all golfers wouldn't exceed 600% or all QBs not exceed 100% together)
2. track historical ownership - most of model here just keeping tabs on who is generally popular and who isn't
3. adjust for updates in price/news/size of slate - some automatically some manually
4.counterbalance it all ie your scheme towards $$$$$$ QBs then other positions will need to skewer on the cheaper side - i think this is the most difficult part and arguably unnecessary
am i anywhere close to the framework of reasonable ownership model iyo?
i think it'd be a bit easier for golf than team sports where matchups are such a big factor
Last edited by rickroll; 07-23-2020 at 12:56 PM.