Quote:
Originally Posted by hedgie43
Would PSG have been fair +180 in a single elimination, neutral venue match against MCI? Or would the fair line be different for that from a 2 leg tie?
If PSG's line on a single elimination match would be different from that of a 2 leg tie, you can't just transitively say that because PSG is >= CHE/RMA, that the line on the final will be MCI >=-180.
i wasn't talking single elimination
but even with home advantage psg were closing line +372 for that single game, obviously that's not a clear equivalent cause that's also accounting for a tie so you don't need to also chime in on that
obviously things are different for single elimination vs two leg, i'm aware of that, you keep on starting out from a basis of assuming i'm an idiot and that's your problem
i simply said the odds for them to proceed beyond psg was -180, i apologize for not explicitly stating it's a two leg event, i would have assumed that were obvious just like if i said the red sox will win the world series and you chime in that it's a best of 7
but bottom line, the odds of mci winning the champions will be far worse than -180 if they beat psg as evidenced by the line's move from +130 to -150 based on the 2-1 result in game 1
that's my point, that's all my point was, that to bet them to advance past psg was -180 and their odds for the following round would certainly be worse, thus why if you like them betting +130 now was good
furthermore, despite offering you free money from someone you insist is an idiot, you oddly don't accept
if you want to keep treating me like i'm a mental midget that's fine, but if you're not willing to take action from the person you think understands this so little he didn't know the ucl format then certaintly you stop insulting his intelligence or pony up and accept the challenge