the article or my following statement?
i didn't actually read that article (well it's possible I have) but just went to google scholar and typed "luck hockey" because i knew there have been many studies on it so it's possible i shared a bad one but unless I'm grossly informed, hockey has a greater luck factor than other sports
i actually thought about editing to mention i was specifically talking about dfs
I actually believe higher variance would actually be good for props - just super frustrating at the early stages when you're still workshopping it due to sample sizes - but i'm a sports betting virgin so honestly have no idea
could you elaborate?