Again...thats not something that only someone whos played hockey would know.

Ok you win.

thank u

@poogs what do you reckon about people who only bet one market?

You reckon it's enough?

Do you reckon people need a minimum amount of bets per year?

I reckon those are all subjective questions impossible to answer without knowing about the person youre talking about. For some people making 30k a year betting sports would be the best thing that ever happened to them. For others, making 300k a terrible year.

Personally I cant imagine only betting one market. I like to spread myself out pretty wide. I guess I could see hyper focusing on one market with big limits but I think youre burning money. If you can beat, say, NBA totals, you can certainly beat other things. So why pass them up.

The cognitive dissonance in those two sentences is literally mind blowing.

What are the markets that you can beat?

Ill answer truthfully if you do the same

Merry X-Mas to all. Nice 2-0 parlay city for X-Mas present

@Fubster
@Inzaghi

Back on 11/28 in post #499 I back checked about 6 weeks of this illustrious query and there were a handful of missing games. This was inside a 6 week time frame, let alone the months and years you guys are attempting to lean on. Here's a few examples..

11/3 CAL/SJS

Game opened around -215 and closed around -215, landed 3-2 final. The query didn't produce this game.

10/25 CAL/STL

Game opened -205 and closed -205 with a 4-1 final score. The query didn't produce this game.


Additionally, this query was posted around origination of this thread and was missing games over a year ago. I wrote it off then as I am proving now.


This angle can't be query checked. If a game opens 5.5 and goes to 5, we're not playing it and vice versa. If a game opens -200 and goes to -180 or vice versa, we're not playing it.

Stop hating and fake fading with the -EV claims. If it's such -EV, where are the fade tickets!!??

Merry Christmas. I'll be around to respond as needed..

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/bett...?date=20161103
11/3 sharks closed -199 on pinnacle

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/bett...?date=20161025
10/25 blues closed -197 on pinnacle

if you read my other post (and if you're literate to the degree that you can read something and absorb information instead of just sounding out the words), i explained in very slow, bite-size pieces what's going on here. the SDQL query only checks pinnacle closing lines, so if it opens at 5.5 and goes to 5, it won't show up. i don't know what the vice versa means, are you saying if a game opens 5 and goes up to 5.5 you pass? that doesn't make any sense but neither does anything else about this so ok. same with a game opening -200 and going to -180 (or in the examples above, -197).

also, just because a blind system is -EV doesn't mean fading it is +EV, but that's a whole new big idea for you to wrap that big brain around. baby steps.

I'm fully aware something being -ev doesn't make flipping it +ev. I just wouldn't put that past this bunch from what I've seen over the year I've been here following the path given to victory.

So what we've determined is, the query is off. Those games were played by myself, posted by Ed, and within given parameters at an overwhelming amount of shops played by all players both locally and offshore. Thank you.

Myth Busted!

by "off," do you mean that it only uses lines from the sportsbook with the tightest NHL margins and that's wrong/bad, or do you mean that it's off because you and the professor are the ultimate arbiters of what is and what isn't a play? please clarify

It's inaccurate, you can't use it as a measuring stick.

Games like Sharks on 11/3 where the line is 200 everywhere and dips to 199 right at close doesn't mean the game does or doesn't fall into play. Same goes for games where the totals open at 5 and move up to 5.5, those would never be played, but would fall into your query.

Clearly an inaccurate representation of profitable angle in question, sorry to disappoint.

LOL are we still pretending you and Ed are different people?

The best part about all of this which was pointed out by someone else, is that there exists a 5.5 line on every single game.

Poogs that's not what we're seeking or the OP would look a lot different. How don't you get it yet? It's been a ****ing year of you tinfoiling and nay`saying..jesus christ imagine if you took a flyer here at some point.. smmfh.

So it's entirely arbitrary then

No. It's entirely profitable since its introduction to this forum. No query we're aware of can produce an accurate summation of the angle. This thread is the only documentation we have and it's undebatably phenomenal.

Hop on the train bud, winning can be fun. I know many guys addicted to losing and this thread reminds me of them from post to post.

Well the query would need an "if won, then include" loop, since that appears to be a cornerstone of the ProfEd angle.

Hi Pro Ed!

I won with your system 2 outta 2

Thanks!

GLGL



1. So tonight we r supposed to lay -140 on the col/chi und 5.5? yes

2. NJ/pit looks nice und 6 -115? yes

lol jfc

Even if we take your naively defiant statement above as truth (a big stretch), it doesn't imply that the bet is +EV. It might merely imply that the bet enjoyed a good run. Have you bothered to draw the distinction?

hey guys!

So tonight car/pit opener was -200
line is -180 now

What am i supposed to do?
Pretend i go back on time and make the wager anyway? WTF?

The under is paying $$$ i am drooling right now!

GLGL

I would leave that one alone.