So in conclusion we don't know what book the query is using nor if it's opening or closing line. It has multiple games that debatably fall in/out of the system in addition to missing multiple games that debatably fall in/out of the system.

You have proven to be as helpful and informative as that query. Thank you. We'll see ya at the window.

The professor has given guidelines and pulled the trigger via posts here for about a year and is documented at a rate people tend to make up. That can't be argued.

Thanks Ed

^ It is a fact that......

How can you argue against fact with a straight face?

Dont be a TROLL or a HATER

/MICDROP

PICKS UP MIC

DROPS IT AGAIN

Maybe there's too much going on here for you Inzaghi.. I'm not sure. I've punched holes through that query with multiple examples and that's only cross referencing the last 30 days..let alone the last 6 years.

So I'll say it again. The query is off, severely. Your buddy has yet to solve the riddles presented.

Big day.

I thought ProfEd decided when there were plays since we're using his magical lineset.

We need a Penguins Amendment.

How do you punch holes through a simple binomial exercise?
Oh wait, let me guess- you cherry picked various months/years within the data set that appear to confirm your belief, ignoring the rest?

Michael, glad to know you're unbanned.

How was it in the can?


No I don't decide, the terms were listed. Bet when you want.

It's profitable last three years my friend over a nice sample. Crushing last two years.

1-2 recently boys.

Tonight we're lock and loaded
Coyotes vs Blackhawks Under 5.5

Along with;

Avalanche/Predators Under 5.5

wait I only just realized that profed is not an old established account but rather a newish (troll) act?

Thanks a lot Professor, I trusted you. Put my ****ing life savings on that ****. In all seriousness I hope no one is ******ed enough to listen to you. I don't know what your angle is but if you're trying fluke your way into building a reputation based of blind luck and selling your tips you're scum. If that's not your intention and you're just planning on giving away your 'tips' for free forever your still scum. Falsely advertising a profitable system is just creating additional revenue for sports betting sites. Worst part is it appears people are actually listening to the bull**** you spew thinking these bets are +EV. You might of ran above expectation short term, realise what happened though, you lucked out you delusional ****. If you have a conscience you should really stop this. You're the ****ing definition of a snake oil salesman.

u5.5 -145 don't think that one counted

It's been profitable and continues to be since posted.

12-6 YTD

Still hugely profitable last two years and overall profitable over a big sample last three years.

It's a troll post

don't know entirely if it applies to this, however the more success something has the more ignorant keyboard warriors seem to stack up

ok so still trying to understand this.. given that there are 4 markets available right now, 3 of them are showing the 5.0 line but 1 is showing 5.5. that's almost an even money game, so the criteria of it having a 5.5 offering but having match odds that are too close renders it out of the criteria? or because its paying a decent amount (-141) then it's still good to take?

Was not a troll post whatsoever, obviously I didn't actually bet my life savings if that's what you were referring to. There's no method behind this system whatsoever, it's a ****ing joke to say the least.

yea the life savings thing lol. to me this just seems like a price exploitation given some game circumstances which isn't working off of a pure mathematical model - just some game assumptions that validate the price of the market as +ev

I have nfi what that means.

me either. Mind explaining sir?

you sound like me when i told my realtor i had a boring finance job dealing with interest rate hedging or some sort of made-up bull**** in that vein and he said "oh really? i wrote my MBA thesis on that, tell me more!"

**** has gotten mad weird. hey mods can we close this crap? I guess maybe not tho provides some serious lulz