2015 NHL Profitable System - Page 9 - Sports Betting - SportsBetting Strategy and Forum

I'll be respectful enough to you to respond to this. Read the above posts. It is evident that people were asking for this to be locked, for the very reason you proved. Seems members did not agree with your idea to share this on other forums as Covers. Perhaps, you can eradicate the problem for others and i'm sure many would appreciate if you closed the thread you made on Covers. This would also be out of respect to the OP who also seemed to have a problem it as well. It is not an enormous and catastrophic deal i would say, but this thread did seem to be proving to be something worth noting and a viable idea.

First of all, I am not JRENO and you couldn't incentivize me to prove so. Not sure what made you think this as I have simply congratulated OP on this angle.

Secondly, this thread is more than something simply noteworthy as the angle is a documented winner at near 90%. Not an idea, theorem, or otherwise quoted here and on covers; a documented winning angle.

I'll be awaiting the next attempt.

Quote

03-03-2016 , 09:31 PM

#202

bigp4pi06

newbie

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 40

Just read over the covers thread and see jreno had quoted my congratulatory post. I assume based off this you think I'm jreno. Therefore, best of luck and god bless your thought processes moving forward.

Quote

03-04-2016 , 12:08 AM

#203

GreenSmoke85

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,427

Guys there is nothing to worry about:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elihu D. Feustel. other alias: Justin7 and Daringly

In gambling when one door closes another one opens

Quote

03-04-2016 , 02:26 AM

#204

handicapper11

banned

Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 47

Terrible odds for the last couple of days (1.40-60) :thumbdown:

Quote

03-04-2016 , 03:52 AM

#205

ProfessorEd

journeyman

Join Date: Dec 2015 Posts: 268

Quote:

Originally Posted by handicapper11

Terrible odds for the last couple of days (1.40-60) :thumbdown:

My friend told me the same exact thing and said all the big favorites were 5 for the total today out of a full card after the nice 2-0!

Quote

03-07-2016 , 03:57 PM

#206

handicapper11

banned

Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 47

Exact same thing as last week, u5.5 was at 1.4x and u5 at 1.90

Quote

03-07-2016 , 04:05 PM

#207

housenuts

1st Quartiled the 500

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 49,669

Looking at lines now. Only line > -200 is kings -265 vs canucks, however the o/u is only 5, so no bets to be had.

Last edited by housenuts; 03-07-2016 at 04:12 PM.

Quote

03-08-2016 , 02:14 AM

#208

handicapper11

banned

Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 47

Was fun while it lasted, odds are terribly low which makes me think there is no real edge on betting straight up in the dark.

Quote

03-09-2016 , 12:55 AM

#209

alexluthor

stranger

Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 4

Quote:

Originally Posted by housenuts

Looking at lines now. Only line > -200 is kings -265 vs canucks, however the o/u is only 5, so no bets to be had.

I am new in NHL and american odds. When you said -200 or better, what did you mean about "better"? Should be, for example: -150 or -250?

Thanks

Quote

03-09-2016 , 08:26 AM

#210

housenuts

1st Quartiled the 500

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 49,669

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexluthor

I am new in NHL and american odds. When you said -200 or better, what did you mean about "better"? Should be, for example: -150 or -250?

I thought about using < vs > here. I meant more than -200, or bigger favorite than -200, eg. -250

I'm not sure what proper notation is, but in the context of what I was saying I think it's clear what was meant.

Quote

03-10-2016 , 02:56 AM

#211

alexluthor

stranger

Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 4

Quote:

Originally Posted by housenuts

I got confused because if you're talking about just odds, better odds when there is a signal "-", it should be -150, for example.

However, If you're talking about team, more favorite team when there is a signal "-", it should be -250.

Quote

03-20-2016 , 02:43 AM

#212

Suiii

newbie

Join Date: Mar 2015 Posts: 15

been waiting patiently all week long...
nhl
Sunday March 20th 2016
7pm Arizona at San Jose -230 u5.5 -135
UNDER!

Quote

03-24-2016 , 10:34 AM

#213

iTzLifestyle

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 8,081

Hmmm lots of -200 or > but no 5.5 line.

I wonder if this thread had anything to do with that.

Quote

03-24-2016 , 11:36 AM

#214

hfrog355

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 6,404

Lol

Quote

03-24-2016 , 11:42 AM

#215

TheStuntman

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 5,390

There was one last night at least on Bovada, Ottawa vs NYI -210 NYI O/U 5.5 U was at -130. Today a few -200 games, but o/u is at 5. CAL vs MIN is close at -180 for MIN.

Quote

03-31-2016 , 03:31 PM

#216

shorn7

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,495

I see two tonight:

Columbus -210; u 5.5 -120

Nashville -260; u 5.5 -130

Gogogogo

Quote

03-31-2016 , 04:05 PM

#217

electrickshiite~

adept

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 806

Quote:

Originally Posted by shorn7

I see two tonight:

Columbus -210; u 5.5 -120

Nashville -260; u 5.5 -130

Gogogogo

03/31 7:05 PM
1 Columbus
2 N.Y. Islanders 5½u-25
+171
-190 5½u-25
+165
-185 5½u-30
+165
-180 5½u-20
+170
-200 5½u-25
+165
-185 5½u-25
+160
-180 5½u-25
+165
-185 5½u-25
+170
-200 5½u-30
+165
-190

-200 at Stations and MGM a lot closer to -185 concensus in vegas

03/31 7:05 PM
3 Nashville
4 Pittsburgh 5½u-25
+122
-135 5½u-30
+120
-140 5½u-35
+120
-130 5½u-30
+120
-140 5½u-30
+120
-140 5½u-30
+115
-135 5½u-30
+125
-145 5½u-30
+120
-140 5½u-30
+115
-135

not seeing -260, might want to sort that out before heading to the window

Quote

03-31-2016 , 05:55 PM

#218

TheStuntman

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 5,390

On Bovada, ARZ vs DAL -225 o/u 5.5 (-105) and CBJ vs NYI -190 o/u 5.5 (-130). Others are o/u of 5 with varying vigs.

Quote

03-31-2016 , 06:10 PM

#219

hfrog355

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 6,404

The Dallas game fits, but with Niemi in net, I can't do it. He's looked brutal since the All-Star Game.

Quote

04-01-2016 , 10:21 AM

#220

shorn7

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,495

Quote:

Originally Posted by electrickshiite~

Actually misread my app for both. Was looking at the +1 1/2 -1 1/2 goals lines. Doh. Lost both of course. But, took the Dallas game and made another error on LA/CAL (under 5 at +135) that left me down only the juice.

Quote

04-01-2016 , 11:20 AM

#221

Wh1teNorth

grinder

Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 626

Took Dallas and Los Angeles race to 3 last night, both managed to scoop.

Quote

04-02-2016 , 02:36 PM

#222

housenuts

1st Quartiled the 500

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 49,669

Florida -201 o/u 5.5 -136 tonight vs Montreal

Quote

04-02-2016 , 05:29 PM

#223

TheStuntman

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 5,390

Quote:

Originally Posted by housenuts

Florida -201 o/u 5.5 -136 tonight vs Montreal

Bovada: Florida -210 o/u 5.5 -140 not sure if I want to pay such a high vig though.

Quote

04-03-2016 , 12:44 AM

#224

bigp4pi06

newbie

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 40

Here for an update since OP has seemingly gone missing in action.

Citing and using his record stated back on 1/24 of 34-4(.89%) and having gone 14-5(.73%) since then we have a grand total record of 48-9(.84%).

Rough loss tonight but definitely impressive overall and will be continuing to follow moving forward.

BOL to ALL

Quote

04-04-2016 , 11:40 AM

#225

RichardStuffington

stranger

Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 4

On Saturday, hit all of these trends both individually and as a parlay on BetOnline.

Hockey - 3 Pittsburgh Penguins/New York Islanders under 5½ -125 for Game
Hockey - 15 Detroit Red Wings/Toronto Maple Leafs under 5½ -135 for Game
Hockey - 19 Calgary Flames/Edmonton Oilers under 5½ -118 for Game
Hockey - 17 San Jose Sharks/Nashville Predators under 5½ -111 for Game
Hockey - 5 Dallas Stars/Los Angeles Kings under 5½ -126 for Game

Quote

Page 9 of 35

First

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 19 29

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 9 of 35

First

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 19 29

Last