This is a hand i played at 50nl - i posted it on the microstakes forum and got universally criticised. I wanted to post it on here as well to see whether, if i took this line in 100nl/200nl game, would this bluff work, or is it spew at higher stakes as well?
One thing i fully accept before anyone says it - my turn betsizing was bad, and should have been more like $14. This aside, is the idea of the hand good?
Dealt to Hero (UTG+1) A
8
1 fold
Hero ($57.95) raises to $1.50
CO ($63.52) calls $1.50
3 folds
Flop ($3.75)
Q
4
4
Hero bets $2.50
CO raises to $5
Hero raises to $11
CO calls $6
Turn ($25.75)
5
Hero bets $17
CO calls $17
River ($59.75)
9
Hero bets $28.45 AI
Villain is 26/18, AF 3, 3bet 3%, fold to cbet 68%, raise cbet 16%
On this flop i cbet to take it down, as he mostly has nothing, planning to barrel if he flats once.
When he raises i think he can do this with a lot, as he never thinks i have anything. I refuse to believe he has any 4 here except quads. He could have a Q.
I reraise the flop because i think it folds out all his marginal 1010/99 type hands, and some Qx as well. If he shoves i fold, but by reraising i get back the initiative. I reraise small to give me room to bet fairly big on most turns and rivers.
On the turn blank i have to carry on if i want to win the pot - otherwise it;s a c/f. I want my bet to look strong but still for value, and like i'm setting up the easy river shove. When he flats, i definitely don't think he has a 4. I'm almost certain he has a Q, and maybe a stubborn JJ.
On the river blank i carry through my story - there's no point betting the turn if i don't shove the river. I think he should fold every Q here as my line looks so strong. I realise the only problem is my turn bet was slightly too big, meaning my river bet is a little too small and he's getting good odds to call. But i still think he should fold enough to make it worthwhile.
Thoughts?