Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian37
This network is turning into a joke imo. Cant wait til next year to switch over to Stars. The past month or so at 100NL speed, it seems like every flop is an action flop where it comes either monotone, or 2 toned and connected. Either that or it runs out out like 4 flush or 4 to a straight. At first I thought I was just being paranoid, which I may in fact be, but after speaking to a few other regs, they seemed to feel the same way. Is anyone else experiencing this?
Also, another thought, I wouldn't put it past these crooks if they disconnected both players in the pot, and then scooped the pot for themselves and both players are like well, that sucks especially because you don't recover HH. Also, these awful fish are also being constantly rewarded for horrendous plays. Obviously suckouts happen and it is super standard in poker, but how these fish keep getting there is starting to boggle my mind. That may be over the top, but too many sketchy things are happening on this network for my liking.
OK, vent over.
it's interesting you mention this. i had been thinking for the past month+ that the fish seem to get really lucky on this site. i've only played 250K hands on the site, so I thought it was variance (i still do for the most part). but i've played over 4million hands in my career, so it's not like i'm some kind of poker noob claiming online poker is rigged because of a few bad beats. fwiw, i ran good when i first started and now am running poorly. the reason i mention this is because if a site were to be rigged (and i'm not saying that ipoker is rigged), the two things i would do are... (1) make it more favorable for losing players so that the games can keep going and generate more rake, (2) make it more favorable for new accounts so they can get hoooked and keep playing more. of course if i were going to rig the games, i would also create superuser accounts on the higher stake games, but that's another can of worms.
again, i'm not saying that's what's going on. all i'm saying is that on the tables i've been on, the fish seem to get luckier than usual and there have been some fish with some absurdly massive stacks. now for every one of us who are on the wrong side of variance vs the fish, there are going to be at least as many who have been running good, so it's really hard to say without some sort of statistical analysis. i just thought it was interesting that you voiced something i had been thinking for a while.
i also find it interesting that the skins are structurally incentivised to keep big winners out.