Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo-san
I'm not sure what you are arguing. Are you saying that the DoJ should have been setting things in motion before the ink is dry on a contract? I'm sure the GBT group would have LOVED that, but that would never happen and can you blame the DoJ??
I'm also not sure why you think GBT's statement reads like that. To me it reads like a PR spin from a company that was just spinning its wheels trying to get a better deal. No idea why you would give a corporation like GBT that has been involved in so much sketchy **** the benefit of the doubt here.
1. GBT likely has a right to be pissed. They just spent 7 months negotiating a deal with all parties, which for much of that period, was probably the best deal that would have happened. They were at the point of hiring people for a relaunch when PS appears to have leapfrogged them from almost out of nowhere.
2. The only reason that PS can leapfrog this deal is because they're in the unique circumstance of having a huge civil case against them from the DOJ, which makes things like FTP's random difficult to figure liabilities, which are a big deal to any other buyer, a minor issue in the grand scheme of things.
3. PS thus carries significant "blame" for the GBT deal falling through.
Again, PS offered a better deal than GBT. This is a good thing, but the reaction from GBT is understandable.