Game is 1/1 nlhe
V1 limps, v2 raises 7x from utg plus one, all folds to hero in the BB, he flats with 45o (no spade) and utg flats. EFF stack 95, villain covers.
I will provide some context. V1 is a loose passive player who will limp calls his entire range less premium and v2 is ABC tight-weak player who has tendencies to either commit stack on top pair or just shut down when the board doesn't connect with him. Against them I was thinking I have the implied odds to call when I hit the universe and if they show any weakness I can easily outmaneuver them...
Flop (21) 3d3sTs
Hero checks, v1 checks, v2 checks.
At this point I was fairly sure v2 was in a check-fold mode with a range of AJ+ and KQ. Time to steal the pot and I can rep a ten or 3 easily that checked awaiting a cbet.
River (21) 2c
Here I turn a straight draw so...
Hero bets 15, v1 calls, v2 folds.
V2 doesn't have a 3 if not he would he raising for value and to make flush draws pay so I range him on gutshots draw, open ended draws, flush draws and low pocket pairs. I thought my perceived range is either 3 or T here.
River (51) Qc
Hero bets 30, villain tank calls and shows 77
Bad bluff? Or did my perceived range consist of too little strong hands to pull off that bluff? I thought my line made sense... I have been playing a fairly tight game which I raised with a lot of premium.
Sent from my MI 3W using 2+2 Forums