Quote:
Originally Posted by runway model
Marshall
Interesting thread many thanks for doing this.
It seems quite a modern poker style to find all those spots and situations where villain isnt willing to play for stacks and 3 barrel relentlessly. This is obviously a winning plan.
I wonder... how willing are you to introduce unorthodox and unusual lines just to get into more of those "weird situations" where you can fire for instance a final river bet or overbet that you know villain won't call.
It seems to me that ABC aggro poker, although good and profitable, is easier to play against than unorthodox overbetting/ underbetting strategies.
Thoughts?
I'd say it depends on how good you are at each style. Both can be very difficult to play against. Any style that constantly puts opponents into tough spots is going to be a good one.
However, one thing to note is that trying too hard in general just to be tough to play against can be a pretty costly mistake. I did this for so long, I ended up playing strictly 2/4 for like 3+ years because I always thought "the best players must be the toughest ones to play against so I want to be like that." But the thing is, I ended up making so many mistakes that they sort of counter acted each other and it just led to super high variance for me and really never being good enough to move up. I have to credit Adam001 and d_zoo for teaching me that, since almost as soon as I stopped overdoing that stuff I moved up.