Quote:
Originally Posted by BananaBalla
3betting this type of hand from the SB is not my standard play by any means, but against these players, I will be dominating their hand ranges a lot on many flops, including many of their hands they will stack off vs me given that it is a 3bet pot.
I mean, I'm confused, but are you saying I shouldn't 3bet anything preflop from the SB? This specific hand?
This is all theory, obviously. I've been applying it with success, but with a small sample size. I don't know how "correct" I am.
I would hope this isn't a standard play, but I really don't think it's a good play here either. There are three immediate benefits I can see from reraising here:
1. Increase the pot size when you have an equity advantage against their range
2. Narrow their range (if you know they always 4-bet AAxx and they just call your re-raise, you know they don't have AAxx)
3. Take initiative in the hand. Increasing the pot size with an equity advantage is where there's one of the biggest differences between PLO and NLHE. Preflop in PLO, edges generally are MUCH smaller than in NLHE, so the equity advantage you gain here is very small (and possibly -EV against better opponents, or at least tighter ones). Narrowing their range is great, although this effect is definitely amplified the more you know how your opponent plays. Taking initiative in the hand isn't very important at all here though, because we're OOP in a 3-way pot against two fish.
In both PLO and NLHE (less so in PLO, which goes back to why I believe in a more passive style preflop), there are two major reasons for re-raising preflop. Those two reasons are
for value and
for fold equity (both preflop and postflop) (it's interesting how they are kind of contradicting elements, isn't it?). Notice how those two reasons are small and non-existent here. This is
huge.
Now weigh this against these disadvantages:
1. You're out of position. This hurts almost every reason you have to 3-bet. When someone has position, they have a lot more room to maneuver, and thus may play trickier. This means that you won't be able to narrow their range as much. Now, we're playing against fish here so this is not necessarily the case, but it's something to keep in mind. Being OOP also makes initiative in a 3-way pot against fish practically worthless. Being OOP ALSO means you're less likely to extract value postflop from your strong hands.
2. Makes the hand harder to play. Although we might have a hand stronger than the ones in their ranges, we still don't have a very strong hand, and we're likely to get into some marginal situations where we'll be faced with tough decisions with hands like top pair and mid two pair.
3. Increases variance. Bigger average pot sizes = more variance. More variance = more swings. More swings = more stress. More stress = more tilt. More tilt = less money in your pocket.
I'm NOT saying that you shouldn't ever 3-bet from the SB, because there can definitely be enough elements in your favor that would make it a good play. However, I do believe it is MUCH better to 3-bet too few hands than it is to 3-bet too many hands.