Quote:
Originally Posted by AKQJ10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Me Up
I'd play H#3, fold H#1/H#2. At least 87 gives us some SD potential, and 77 can potentially flop top set without a straight being on board (66-22 can't do that). The first two hands are equally trashy IMO, and we should only be flatting them OTB if we think A) villain is particularly weak/predictable, and B) another player like Wild Guy won't get involved and dilute our total equity. Not sure any factor(s) really align for you here except the positional advantage.
This surprises me. I see it as 1 >>> 3 > 2 (though 3 vs 2 is close), all playable for these odds.
To me the key feature of this set of hands in this game is the suited ace. Really, it's the only thing that makes any of those hands playable. People know in this game know they shouldn't chase low FDs and then pay off but they do anyway. Wild guy fits that profile especially. I tend to underestimate the damage of the oversuit (third club). It's not just that it takes away an out. If my opponents play any suited hand, with my standard nut flush there are 8 choose 2 = 28 different two-card combos they can have to pay me off. With an extra club dead, there are 7 choose 2 = 21. Getting paid off 25% less often is huge.
Truthfully though I'm never playing it, I think A
2
2
2
might be nominally profitable in this game. NFDs are just that valuable.
So, take away the oversuit and I suspect this hand is fine, especially at crazy preflop odds. Make it A
2
2
4
and now you have a hand that Jeff Hwang recognizes as a bona fide OK speculative hand for noobs (mostly because it can flop set plus NFD more easily).
As for hands 2 and 3....
My view: 77 vs 22 doesn't add that much. Obviously it's great against sets of treys through sixes or stupid two pairs that fill up when a low card pairs. "Can potentially flop top set without a straight being on board" seems like little more than a fun trivia question to me. Playing it for the 7-x-2 potential (x=3 through 6) or 7-x-x- where x = a low pair seems almost as speculative as playing A24 for the nut wheel potential. Not literally of course (precisely 53A is harder and I have an ace) but in terms of whether it makes a bad hand marginally OK.
87 doesn't make many nut straights, although obviously they fade fewer overcards than nut wheels do. If it were in position at a mid-low SPR I'd much rather have the wrappiness than one straight dyad 87 plus medium pair. With an ambiguous SPR it's not clear to me.
But the NFD potential with a big stack set to enter, that's golden. So I'm taking (A2)24 out of the three.
Quote:
Edit - As for other potential candidate holdings we can either flat or 3b with toward the bottom of our range in position, I tend to subscribe to Hwang's small-ball methodology on this. Stuff like JT84ss, QT96ds, and even well structured "two holdem hands" like AK76ds, etc.
For a 3! deeper stacked where I can isolate, that's an OK approach. In this game it's plausible I might get my 3! called multiway, which is not good. But in this particular spot anything without an ace like (J4)T8 runs a huge risk of getting HU against Sold Guy's AAxx or at least his KQJT type hand with SPR < 1 which is just burning money. With an ace, it's less likely Solid Guy has aces two but much more damaging to be HU when he does.
But truthfully, as much as I want to get better at PLO, I feel like I should save the small ball tactics for a different game type where they're more likely to work, not build $300 6-way preflop pots and play limit Omaha high postflop.
(LOLWashington)
Little exaggeration, not much of one. People really love their preflop lottery tickets in this game.