Villian is 26/19 over 100 hands. Is a reg.
Preflopcall a little weak?
But I have position going to the flop and don't expect someone is going to squezze here.So I call.
It seems a litlle weird that villian not have raised the flop after a weak player have donked into it for 1BB...
Turnplay: I put villian on high cards wirth fd maybe some overpairs + fd..
Should I bet the turn here for value to get villian to call with his draw one more street?
I thought, if I check the turn after raise the flop after this weird flop action it looks weak in his eays. So I decided to check the turn to induce some riverbluffs.
River: easy call?!

fold pre... I know, boring answer but you will entice multiway action which you don't want with this hand because suits are useless multiway. this is a hand to open on the button and sb, maaaaybe co if btn is a nit.

as played, I think flop raise is a bit large and scary for villains, I would raise to something like 5$ to try to keep weaker hands inside. then you could also bet this turn something like 12$ into 18 and check river.

I think you should still bet turn like 1/2 pot, his utg range doesn't have many 6x, his calling range should mostly be overpairs with flush draws so K isn't exactly the best card, but still I think worth betting, tho getting raised would suck. you checked and river is an easy call as played.

Pre is borderline and depends a lot on table dynamics imo. Agree with a lot of what md said about the sizing.
That pot flop raise is terrible.

Fold pre unless UTG is a whale, then 3-bet iso.

I would probably raise it to 5-6 flop but that's a minor issue.

Bet turn

Checkback river.


As played I have no idea what UTG is repping on river, he should have no straights here. His flop calling range is high cards DS cards with a 6 dangler (AKJ6ds type stuff), overpairs with FD. He really shouldn't have much for bluffs with a calling range on flop. He should have basically 0 hands that are on a combo draw from UTG. I would fold and as played. I would expect to see K6 and KK a lot in this spot. There isn't a reason for him to turn his overpairs into a bluff.

I don't mind flop sizing since the way the hand went down you can have complete air here.

I think I prefer a small turn protection bet. I'm really putting villain on pair/flush draw a lot here, and I don't really expect to see either a call or a river bluff from a reg.

As played, again, I usually don't expect for a reg to bet river like this with a flop overpair/flush draw hand, but we're getting decent odds, we have a 3 (and 6) blocker, its really hard for a reg to have a 6 anyway (just called minbet and then just called flop raise on a flush draw board, and even 22 and 62 mostly will want to protect from overpairs).

Flop raise is a bit under 75% pot.

I wouldn't be surprised if after doing some simulations you'd find that this hand is not a call vs. UTG open & rather an optimal fold.

You can 3bet players who open to wide,otherwise rather fold.

Flop raise of 75% is perfectly fine againsts 2 players.

I don`t like turn check as your hand is still vulnerable to flushdraws and overpairs so

2/3pot bet woul be optimal.If you know player wont call you 3 streets with aa or kk

there are some reasons for checking,but here I prefer bet.

On river villain is rapping really only kk or bluff so easy call and no point in raising.

My bad, misread the size. Still betting a bit smaller myself though

I think this hand plays fairly well as both a call or 3bet pre-flop, I can appreciate fold in certain game dynamics or just for mass-multitablers who want to play narrower ranges but I don't think this is a standard fold in a 6max with such well connected double suits

As played, I think turn is a standard bet, obviously bluff-catching on the river but villain line should have a decent amount of air after the unusual xback

Or at least I don't think he has that many 35xx hands in range for his position and the line and with us holding the 73

3b pre imo. Call still better than folding given SB is rec.