IMO it's the other way around, like I explained. TT76r plays poorly oop. and rarely gets a good piece of the board. Are we relying on most of our opponents to give up to our barrels often enough to make it +EV? I find that in BvB situations my open gets called a ton, same goes for my c-bet. So we face many turn spots oop with a hand that often amounts to air. yuck?

Is this handchart good?

Is the programm worth it? Also there are vids i heared?
Is it possible to get those handcharts without the software?

The program is decent. I probably have to put more time into really understanding it though.

I got some F leaks that i find strange. I'll just start with the one i find strangest first:

1 ) SB Rerasie Steal , It suggesting the best lines is between 5,4 and 8,5. This seems to be very low? If so how can leakbuster be so wrong about the best SB resteal% ?

Comments?

Leakbuster stats are based on stats from biggest winners from the stakes in question. While my own stats are def higher, doesn't mean the range mentioned above wouldn't be correct for your stakes (PLO10-25?)

yes i was thinking it had to be something like that myself, this is mainly 0,5-1 and 1-2. It just still felt so smaal that i found it strange that would be the average sb steal for the biggest winners there. And in anny case this is something that makes leakbuster less great tool, as it can make players make incorrect changes in their game, like trying to achive this smaal sbresteal . Exactly this part of my game i know should be much higher, but it makes me much more unsertain abaout how to incorporate the other advices i get from leakbuster, those im not so sure what is korrect stats.

So I'm a bit confused now..
Lets say im winning 3bb/100h in a play with a stat X doing it 50%.
If leakbuster has a set stat base to which it is comparing my stats
And says the optimal X would be lets say 42%, and the average 42%X would win 2.5bb/100h.

Does the leakbuster now say that I have a potential leak doing 8% too much of the X even when im winning more than the average guy in the spot?

How about if the average 42%X would win 5bb\100h, would it still tell me i have a potential leak or would it tell im doing just fine?

Im asking to get a bit of feel to the program and its trustfullness.
Thanks for the answer! Im thinking about buying the app, im not sure yet tho.

A leak in LB is simply an instance where your stats deviate from those of the big winners at that stake. You need to think real carefully if it's actually suboptimal in relation to your overall game.

Say you have a VPIP of 10% and you c-bet flop and turn 80% and 70% respectively. Leakbuster will say you are c-betting too much, as someone with a regular VPIP can't get away with such frequencies, but the bottom of your range on most turns is naked overpairs.

A crude example, but goes to show a leak in LB isn't necessarily a leak in real life. It's just something for you to think about critically.

LB is laughable...
ranges are way off....

i did for my coaching tons of db analyzes..and i did them srysly...
when we want determine "most profitable" ranges..we've to break them down by stakes...
there is no way around....(the less rake you pay..the more hds you can play profitably..etc.)

so far as i recall...most ridic stat range was rivercall efficiency
i remember that i thought...wow,who is playing inert all those "optimal" ranges ..will have a very hard time

Regarding my spesifik stat, sb resteal, i also find it relly strange this is more optimal at the low stakes. As the spots usually are more soft than higher limits, less 4B, less squeez, higher fold vs 3b, higher fold to cb in 3b pots etc, all factors that faviours a high sb resteal. Its just strange...