Quote:
Originally Posted by Czech Rays
He's certainly better than anyone posting in this thread. Hence the resentment.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
the only resentment is from the fanboy defenders that resent the quality of his play being called into question - asked honestly and humbly by patient and thoughtful posters.
Even if nandez is good, your immediate shooting down of the question denotes fear and maybe an unhealthy attachment.
Personally I don't believe he is a great player. I think he is a good player, where his fallback to aggression and willingness to gamble, and all around feel for the game helps him at his stakes.
As far as thinking things through and determining what he himself and his opponents rep, and then how to proceed from there, i think he falls short.
In the hand at 3:17, I think as played the river should be bet. If you're getting trapped you're getting trapped, but you rep enough to stab the river. I don't think it's safe to check and watch opponent fire out pot and then pat yourself on the back for a good fold and never think of the hand again. It's likely he bet because you forfeited the initiative essentially giving up. He can't check to induce and call with his little sdv.
Last edited by 5th Suit; 02-24-2019 at 04:57 PM.