Quote:
Originally Posted by abracadabranuts
What if our cbet range isn't too wide even betting low flush draws
For example we don't cbet hands that others sometimes do, basically say our cbet range is balanced with us cbetting the low flush draw.
and only using 3/4 and pot bet sizing as i mentioned for all river bets
Well, i dont think that would make sense, and you would end up losing value with a lot of hands. Is this hand betting for value, protection or bluff? It only really makes sense as bluff because we block some of the opponents continueing range, but its akward when we hit. I guess the "basically say our cbet range is balanced with us cbetting the low flush draw." was just hypothetical to get some more answers, because it does not make a ton of sense to be betting betting majority of low-mid FDs here and checking back majority of K/A FDs e.g.
Bet size determine how many bluffs you should have in relation to valuebets. If you bet 3/4 here with mid flushes for value, after a cbet OTF you´re value range is extremely wide and i dont see how you could make that work.
If you´re betting way lower OTR, i could see it possible to make your river range more balanced. But goes back to the fact that you will basicly cbet anytime you have a small piece OTF here, and therefore not have a lot of bluffs OTR, when you dont have many bluffs in your range, a small sizing works. I would not recommend this strategy, construct your ranges in a way so you have many bluffs in your ranges, and bet big.
Sorry if im rambling.
M