Two Plus Two Poker Forums Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read TwoPlusTwo.com

 Notices

 Small Stakes PL Omaha Discussion of 1/2 and below pot-limit Omaha poker

 01-24-2009, 01:55 PM #1 Quasar30 old hand     Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,867 Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO Scenario: The game is Pot limit omaha. CO raise pot. You hold 9864ds on the BTN and 3-bet. CO 4-bets. Let's say we have 100BBs. It is 25.5BBs to call the 4-bet and villain has 37.5% of his stack in the pot. We are almost certain villain got AA** which means we are not likely to be dominated by a better rundown If we call another 25.5BBs PF with an equity disadvantage of Hand Pot equity AA ** 56.35% 9c8s6c4s 43.65% 56.3 to 43.6, how often do we need to hit the flop good enough for this to be EV + and do we hit the flop this often? (37.5 * 2) * 0.4365 [Preflop] + (62.5 * 2) * X * Y [Post Flop] > = (100-12) [already invested 12] Where X is the equity post flop and Y is how often we are able to continue. This can not be calculated without some sort of integral calculus, but we can make a rough estimate. Let's say we continue on all flops where we have odds to call his pot-sized shove on the flop. We need around 30% equity cause the shove is a little less than pot. Therefore we call on 68% of the flops. Now we calculate the average equity on these flops. 68%*30%+54%*10%+40%*10%+27%*10% +16%*10%+8%*10%+4%*10% = 0.204+0.054+0.040+0.027+0.016+0.008+0.004 = 35.3% And the triangle-shaped pieces [(68%-54%)*10%+ (54%-40%)*10%+ (40%-27%)*10%+ (27%-16%)*10%+ (16%-8%)*10%+ (8%-4%)*10%+ 4%*10%] /2 = [1.4% + 1.4% + 1.3% + 1.1% + 0.8% + 0.4%*2] / 2 = 3.4% So overall, we have 35.3 +3.4 = 38.7% equity on average. __________________________________________ Finally X = 38.7% and Y = 68%. The formual gives (37.5 * 2) * 0.4365 [Preflop] + (62.5 * 2) * 0.387 * 0.68 [Post Flop]> =? (100-12) [already invested 12] 32.74 + 32.90 = 65.6 which is a lot less than the 88 we need Conclusion: It is massively EV- to call the PF 4-bet ___________________________________________ Where are the misstakes? Last edited by Quasar30; 01-24-2009 at 02:06 PM.
01-24-2009, 02:11 PM   #2
luckyme
Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,801
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Quasar30 Where are the misstakes?
er, uhhhhh...

 01-24-2009, 02:19 PM #3 Zeno Le Misanthrope     Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Spitsbergen Posts: 16,303 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO This post does not belong in SMP (Science, Math, Philosophy) so I moved it here for mauling, castigation or ultimate destruction/deletion. Anyway, it certainly has more of a chance for useful answers involving poker/omaha here than in SMP. -Zeno Last edited by Zeno; 01-24-2009 at 02:31 PM.
 01-24-2009, 04:23 PM #4 The 1 and only JC Guest   Posts: n/a Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO you are just an idiot guy
 01-24-2009, 05:23 PM #5 Hoopster81 Carpal \'Tunnel     Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: between the click of the light and the start of the dream Posts: 7,188 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO Interesting - I've been calling here always, but mostly cause that's what DJ Sensei and RBK were doing in their vids
 01-24-2009, 06:06 PM #6 xaxa old hand     Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 1,493 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO nice post, dunno if it's relevant but one point may be that there are some flops we easy can give up and so we save ~half of our stack. also there are flops AA** is playing c/f
01-24-2009, 06:48 PM   #7
GoChoo

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Chi
Posts: 962
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Quasar30 Scenario: The game is Pot limit omaha. CO raise pot. You hold 9864ds on the BTN and 3-bet. CO 4-bets. Let's say we have 100BBs. It is 25.5BBs to call the 4-bet and villain has 37.5% of his stack in the pot. We are almost certain villain got AA** which means we are not likely to be dominated by a better rundown If we call another 25.5BBs PF with an equity disadvantage of Hand Pot equity AA ** 56.35% 9c8s6c4s 43.65% 56.3 to 43.6, how often do we need to hit the flop good enough for this to be EV + and do we hit the flop this often? (37.5 * 2) * 0.4365 [Preflop] + (62.5 * 2) * X * Y [Post Flop] > = (100-12) [already invested 12] Where X is the equity post flop and Y is how often we are able to continue. This can not be calculated without some sort of integral calculus, but we can make a rough estimate. Let's say we continue on all flops where we have odds to call his pot-sized shove on the flop. We need around 30% equity cause the shove is a little less than pot. Therefore we call on 68% of the flops. Now we calculate the average equity on these flops. 68%*30%+54%*10%+40%*10%+27%*10% +16%*10%+8%*10%+4%*10% = 0.204+0.054+0.040+0.027+0.016+0.008+0.004 = 35.3% And the triangle-shaped pieces [(68%-54%)*10%+ (54%-40%)*10%+ (40%-27%)*10%+ (27%-16%)*10%+ (16%-8%)*10%+ (8%-4%)*10%+ 4%*10%] /2 = [1.4% + 1.4% + 1.3% + 1.1% + 0.8% + 0.4%*2] / 2 = 3.4% So overall, we have 35.3 +3.4 = 38.7% equity on average. __________________________________________ Finally X = 38.7% and Y = 68%. The formual gives (37.5 * 2) * 0.4365 [Preflop] + (62.5 * 2) * 0.387 * 0.68 [Post Flop]> =? (100-12) [already invested 12] 32.74 + 32.90 = 65.6 which is a lot less than the 88 we need Conclusion: It is massively EV- to call the PF 4-bet ___________________________________________ Where are the misstakes?
In your post flop equity calc of .387, you've calculated the average equity of the times you have the right pot odds to call, so by multiplying .68 aren't you effectively double-counting the percent of the flops you can continue? since you're average equity calculation was weighted by the percent flop, i think the 0.387 is a 'true' equity calculation assuming that 68% of the flops will give you the right odds.

also, why didn't you put in MMMM instead of 9864 since any middle rundowns are effectively the same.

 01-24-2009, 07:09 PM #8 uphigh_downlow veteran   Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,222 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO I find it hard to respond to long posts. So I'll simply post this before I forget it. You equate the (summation of Xi * Yi) to (N * Xavg * Y avg), which might not be true for the distribution of X and Y, especially at the edges. Is there a way to get scientific notation to display properly on this site? Also assuming that the 3-bet is inherently break-even, we have an equity overlay preflop as well which you fail to include in this computation. Or you could even argue that the 3-bet is inherently a -Ev proposition, ad you need to make up equity postflop. You have not discussed your assumptions which seems that the flop is always a shove by the opponent, which is not always true, as there is an equity overlay because of bluffing/semi-bluffing involved. ps: This is just from a quick read since you havent given many cliffs notes for your calcs. ______________ 1) 88\$ to win \$200 @43.65% gives you a loss of 0.70\$ as it seems. So are you askig if its better to shove or flat? 2) Why do you think that the area under the graph represents our average equity? (more edits coming) Last edited by uphigh_downlow; 01-24-2009 at 07:34 PM.
 01-24-2009, 07:21 PM #9 iggymcfly runs good at HORSE     Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Missoula, MT Posts: 25,361 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO I don't have time to break this down in-depth right now, but I'm really suspicious of your little squares and triangles counting method that gives you 38% equity on average when you can correctly call a flop shove. In fact, I'm 100% sure that it's wrong. There's no way that your average equity on good flops can be lower than your preflop equity. I think you may actually need to divide that by .68 to get your average flop equity as GoChoo suggested.
01-24-2009, 07:47 PM   #10
Quasar30
old hand

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,867
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

Quote:
 Originally Posted by uphigh_downlow I find it hard to respond to long posts. So I'll simply post this before I forget it. You equate the (summation of Xi * Yi) to (N * Xavg * Y avg), which might not be true for the distribution of X and Y, especially at the edges. Is there a way to get scientific notation to display properly on this site? Also assuming that the 3-bet is inherently break-even, we have an equity overlay preflop as well which you fail to include in this computation. Or you could even argue that the 3-bet is inherently a -Ev proposition, ad you need to make up equity postflop. You have not discussed your assumptions which seems that the flop is always a shove by the opponent, which is not always true, as there is an equity overlay because of bluffing/semi-bluffing involved.
I tried to make it as simple as possible.
This is hard enough for someone who hasnt read a single poker book

Something is wrong in the calcs for sure...was wondering what that might be and if its possible to fix it or maybe even the method is wrong?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by uphigh_downlow 1) 88\$ to win \$200 @43.65% gives you a loss of 0.70\$ as it seems. So are you askig if its better to shove or flat? 2) Why do you think that the area under the graph represents our average equity? (more edits coming)

I assumed that the area represented the average equity but maybe it is wrong also.

Last edited by Quasar30; 01-24-2009 at 08:07 PM.

 01-24-2009, 07:49 PM #11 Xr8ed Pooh-Bah     Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,403 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO The answer is to raise less when you 3-bet. Seriously.
01-24-2009, 07:57 PM   #12
Quasar30
old hand

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,867
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GoChoo In your post flop equity calc of .387, you've calculated the average equity of the times you have the right pot odds to call, so by multiplying .68 aren't you effectively double-counting the percent of the flops you can continue? since you're average equity calculation was weighted by the percent flop, i think the 0.387 is a 'true' equity calculation assuming that 68% of the flops will give you the right odds.
But removing 68% seems wrong also...i think...

You got 38.7%(if my calcs are correct, which they probably arent...) on the flops you dont fold and if you dont include 68% its like you call on every flop with on average 38.7%, right?

01-24-2009, 08:06 PM   #13
uphigh_downlow
veteran

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,222
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

scrap my last post.

allow me this

Quote:
 (37.5 * 2) * 0.4365 [Preflop] + (62.5 * 2) * X * Y [Post Flop] > = (100-12) [already invested 12]
The LHS of your equation is sklansky dollars of the call

The RHS is what you have left.

I dont see how you can equate the two.

you can compare the s\$ of the call with the s\$ of the fold( which I believe to be -24)

Allow me this:

You finish the hand Y times and win X *200
You do not finish the hand 1-Y times and lose 37.5

This has to be better than -12*2

X * Y * 200 - {(1-Y) *37.5 } >= --24

0.12 > -24

profit. Whats wrong ?

Now back to checking out the graph, although the area seems the right equity to be concerned about.

Last edited by uphigh_downlow; 01-24-2009 at 08:35 PM.

01-24-2009, 08:09 PM   #14
GoChoo

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Chi
Posts: 962
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Quasar30 I tried to make it as simple as possible. This is hard enough for someone who hasnt read a single poker book Something is wrong in the calcs for sure...was wondering what that is and if its possible to fix it or maybe even the method is wrong? Im asking about flatting his 4bet. I assumed that the area represented the average equity but maybe it is wrong also.
My guess is that you have to come up with a probability distribution function to accurately calculate the true equity, which is not a trivial task. Considering this problem appears to be non-linear...

Using your method, my interpretation is that you said that 68% of the time you have a 30% equity plus 54% of the time you gain 10% equity. If you're going to use that approximation, I think you also need to subtract the equity that is past 30% for the sake of consistency (undecided how precise it is yet).

I haven't excercise my math skills beyond excel for 10 yrs so I dunno how much more useful I can be in this discussion. Its a good start and I'm also interested in the results along with other situations.

 01-24-2009, 08:10 PM #15 Scar18 adept     Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 935 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO I find it much easier to use to following formula: EV(Post Flop) = CALL% [\$Flop Pot Size * AvEq - \$Amount to call on Flop] CALL% = % we can call (around 30% as u stated in your example) AvEq = Average all-in flop equity when calling I cannot take credit for the structure of this formula as i read it somewhere else, the one i previously used was a little longer and similar to yours. however i cannot remember who/where it was posted (not on 2+2 i am sure), so apologies to the original source. Ill make a very hastily and rough attempt at solving this. ill use an example of a .5/1 game so 1bb = \$1 (and exactly 100bb stacks). after the initial 3-bet its \$25.5 more to you ie; post flop EV must be >\$25.50. thus on the flop you are calling \$62.50 to win \$137.50 = 2.2:1 = ~31% ev required (will use ur graph) Im not posting my calcs as i simple cbf, but: EV postflop = .68 * (\$137.50 * .558 - \$62.50) =\$9.60 which would imply that calling is indeed -EV I used Quasars numbers for the most part, and also did this exceptionally fast, and therefore could be even more incorrect than the original
01-24-2009, 08:14 PM   #16
Peeda
grinder

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 480
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Quasar30 But removing 68% seems wrong also...i think... You got 38.7%(if my calcs are correct, which they probably arent...) on the flops you dont fold and if you dont include 68% its like you call on every flop with on average 38.7%, right?
Think the .68 is OK, I did a similar calc in a post that a bit simpler not too long ago. The 38.7 is definately wrong though. Don't need advanced calculus, adding up area under curve by hand is correct, but you added wrong.

Looks like you're trying to do a Riemann sum (fancy term for adding up squares and triangles) but theres some weird 68% * 30% thing at front. Why are we adding in the equity for the times we fold? We're not calling 100% postflop.

01-24-2009, 08:20 PM   #17
GoChoo

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Chi
Posts: 962
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Scar18 I find it much easier to use to following formula: EV(Post Flop) = CALL% [\$Flop Pot Size * AvEq - \$Amount to call on Flop] CALL% = % we can call (around 30% as u stated in your example) AvEq = Average all-in flop equity when calling I cannot take credit for the structure of this formula as i read it somewhere else, the one i previously used was a little longer and similar to yours. however i cannot remember who/where it was posted (not on 2+2 i am sure), so apologies to the original source. Ill make a very hastily and rough attempt at solving this. ill use an example of a .5/1 game so 1bb = \$1 (and exactly 100bb stacks). after the initial 3-bet its \$25.5 more to you ie; post flop EV must be >\$25.50. thus on the flop you are calling \$62.50 to win \$137.50 = 2.2:1 = ~31% ev required (will use ur graph) Im not posting my calcs as i simple cbf, but: EV postflop = .68 * (\$137.50 * .558 - \$62.50) =\$9.60 which would imply that calling is indeed -EV I used Quasars numbers for the most part, and also did this exceptionally fast, and therefore could be even more incorrect than the original
The mean equity is different from the median equity. So .558 is not likely to be correct.

Also if the EV is \$9.60 then isn't it +EV to call?

 01-24-2009, 08:24 PM #18 Peeda grinder   Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Santa Barbara Posts: 480 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO Alright just eyeballed it. Just eyballing it, looks like the graph can be broken up "approximately" into two fairly straightish segments, the 0 - 8% of flops with between 80 and 100% equity (lets say ~90 on average) and the 8 - 68% of flop with 30ish to high 70sish (looking at the midpoint as38 on the X axis, looks like 52% or 53% equity is the midpoint). so 8/68 * 90% + 60/68 * 53% gives .575 as our average postflop equity when we call. Not exact but I'm lazy and don't want to add like 10 segments up.
01-24-2009, 08:28 PM   #19
Quasar30
old hand

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,867
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Peeda Think the .68 is OK, I did a similar calc in a post that a bit simpler not too long ago. The 38.7 is definately wrong though. Don't need advanced calculus, adding up area under curve by hand is correct, but you added wrong. Looks like you're trying to do a Riemann sum (fancy term for adding up squares and triangles) but theres some weird 68% * 30% thing at front. Why are we adding in the equity for the times we fold? We're not calling 100% postflop.
Yepp, a Riemann sum.
68%*30% is the largest rectangle below the graph.

We are not folding these times. 68% is all the flops we call and we got 30% equity at least on these flops. Then i add Z*10%, each smaller rectangle below the graph, to get the correct sum.

 01-24-2009, 08:28 PM #20 Jeans Scandinavian Superstar     Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,029 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO This is a really interesting topic I've been wondering alot about but don't know how to do the math of it... looking forward to more replys
 01-24-2009, 08:30 PM #21 GoChoo adept     Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: The Chi Posts: 962 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO Seems reasonable since we only care about the average equity when we have a favorable board texture which I presumed to be much higher than 38%.
01-24-2009, 08:34 PM   #22
Scar18

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GoChoo The mean equity is different from the median equity. So .558 is not likely to be correct. Also if the EV is \$9.60 then isn't it +EV to call?
You are correct, and i have completely forgotten how to do this, so i am as intrigued by this thread as anyone.

however, EV (post flop) must be greater than the preflop call in order for the call to be +EV, ie; in my incorrect calculations you would be calling \$25.50 to return \$9.60 for a loss of \$15.90 on the call.

 01-24-2009, 08:37 PM #23 Peeda grinder   Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Santa Barbara Posts: 480 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO alright you added up the areas horizontally, which can't be right. you have to add up the areas in vertical strips since we're trying to average the value on the vertical axis. You took an average of the value on the horizontal axis, which is not what want
 01-24-2009, 08:40 PM #24 uphigh_downlow veteran   Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,222 Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO I think you have the wrong area. You should be looking at the >30% equity area and not <68% flops The are has to obtained 'vertically', because we are interested in the average of equity * %flops for the average equity. And in addition the sklansky dollar equation needs to be modified. Assuming 12\$ ante You finish the hand Y times and win X *200 You do not finish the hand 1-Y times and lose 25.5 This has to be better than -12*2 X * Y * 200 - {(1-Y) *25.5 } >= --24 Would you be kind enough to do the sum Last edited by uphigh_downlow; 01-24-2009 at 08:48 PM.
01-24-2009, 08:41 PM   #25
Quasar30
old hand

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,867
Re: Calling a 4-bet PF in PLO

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Peeda Alright just eyeballed it. Just eyballing it, looks like the graph can be broken up "approximately" into two fairly straightish segments, the 0 - 8% of flops with between 80 and 100% equity (lets say ~90 on average) and the 8 - 68% of flop with 30ish to high 70sish (looking at the midpoint as38 on the X axis, looks like 52% or 53% equity is the midpoint). so 8/68 * 90% + 60/68 * 53% gives .575 as our average postflop equity when we call. Not exact but I'm lazy and don't want to add like 10 segments up.
Im not good enough on these things to understand your calculation.
But if i try the same i get

8%*80%+8%*20%/2+60%*30%+60%*50%/2

= 0.064 + 0.008 + 0.18 + 0.15 = 0.4

which is almost the same i got in the orginal calculation.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Links to Popular Forums     News, Views, and Gossip     Beginners Questions     Marketplace & Staking     Casino & Cardroom Poker     Internet Poker     NL Strategy Forums     Poker Goals & Challenges     Las Vegas Lifestyle     Sporting Events     Politics     Other Other Topics Two Plus Two     About the Forums     Two Plus Two Magazine Forum     The Two Plus Two Bonus Program     Two Plus Two Pokercast     The Best of Two Plus Two Marketplace & Staking     Commercial Marketplace     General Marketplace     Staking - Offering Stakes     Staking         Staking - Offering Stakes         Staking - Seeking Stakes         Staking - Selling Shares - Online         Staking - Selling Shares - Live         Staking Rails         Transaction Feedback & Disputes     Transaction Feedback & Disputes Coaching & Training     Coaching Advice     Cash Game Poker Coach Listings     Tournament/SNG Poker Coach Listings Poker News & Discussion     News, Views, and Gossip     Poker Goals & Challenges     Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance     That's What She Said!     Poker Legislation & PPA Discussion hosted by Rich Muny     Twitch - Watch and Discuss Live Online Poker     Televised Poker General Poker Strategy     Beginners Questions     Books and Publications     Poker Tells/Behavior, hosted by: Zachary Elwood     Poker Theory     Psychology No Limit Hold'em Strategy     Medium-High Stakes PL/NL     Micro-Small Stakes PL/NL     Medium-High Stakes Full Ring     Micro-Small Stakes Full Ring     Heads Up NL     Live Low-stakes NL Limit Texas Hold'em Strategy     Mid-High Stakes Limit     Micro-Small Stakes Limit Tournament Poker Strategy     STT Strategy     Heads Up SNG and Spin and Gos     Mid-High Stakes MTT     Small Stakes MTT     MTT Community     Tournament Events Other Poker Strategy     High Stakes PL Omaha     Small Stakes PL Omaha     Omaha/8     Stud     Draw and Other Poker Live Poker     Casino & Cardroom Poker         Venues & Communities         Regional Communities     Venues & Communities     Tournament Events         WPT.com     Home Poker     Cash Strategy     Tournament Strategy Internet Poker     Internet Poker         nj.partypoker.com         Global Poker         MPN – Microgaming Poker Network         Big Ugly Poker     Commercial Software     Software         Commercial Software         Free Software General Gambling     Backgammon Forum hosted by Bill Robertie.     Probability     Sports Betting     Other Gambling Games 2+2 Communities     Other Other Topics         OOTV         Game of Thrones     The Lounge: Discussion+Review     EDF     Las Vegas Lifestyle     BBV4Life         omg omg omg     House of Blogs Sports and Games     Sporting Events         Single-Team Season Threads         Fantasy Sports     Fantasy Sports, sponsored by Draftboard.com         Sporting Events     Wrestling     Golf     Chess and Other Board Games     Video Games         League of Legends         Hearthstone     Puzzles and Other Games Other Topics     Politics     History     Business, Finance, and Investing     Science, Math, and Philosophy     Religion, God, and Theology     Travel     Health and Fitness     Laughs or Links!     Computer Technical Help     Programming International Forums     Deutsch         BBV [German]     Français     Two Plus Two en Español

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 AM.

 Contact Us - Two Plus Two Publishing LLC - Privacy Statement - Top