Hoopman,
I played 8 zooms for 45 minutes and then just added another 15 minutes worth of hands because I couldn't be arsed playing the other 15 minutes. So whatever dumbass imaginations are going on in your head about how I conclude- are not true.
I explained to shimmy about the 1000 hands being too low because of quick folding and he understood and confirmed, my 8 zooms is going to be alot different to Shimmy's depending on our vpip and how fast we make decisions.
I have to significantly shortcut my cognitive decision model as I add volume which does lessen edge, however this game (life) is about hourly and not bb/100. I was a huge rakeback machine in full tilt with this method, especially before they switched the rake method (>1k$/week 8 rushing plo10 and 25 in RB alone and i was still profitable on top of that by a good winrate because I am awesome)
I actually argue that Shimmy is not efficient at 8 tabling zooms if he is only getting 1000hands/hour as this can be achieved with less tables and quick fold. I believe that Shimmy would surpass that hands/hour with less zooms but utilizing the quick fold so this means that there is no purpose to be playing 8 zooms with the goal of increasing hands/hour. To be honest hoopman by trolling you only show ignorance on the subject.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey
now tell me how you win doing this for those hours/day
The uniform start/finsh cognitive system is very important in maintaining a balanced outcomes in high volume pressures. In low volumes we are thinking, in high volumes we are remembering (remembering thinking). So to play high volume we have to reduce the need for thinking and naturally we do so by playing stronger ranges and lower spr's, and by having a good memory and experience and by studying the game so that things become standardized. Also you have to reduce the 'poker language' - poker can be infintiely complicated, very long algorythsms and patterns but we also have the choice to think about poker in very simplified terms - which I don't really reveal because I have worked very hard in developing these things. I know what the main leaks are relative to PLO, I have whole session reflective diaries and spreadsheets detailing these things (and i realised inplications in mental health and my study/work is in that direction now where I will reveal for 'charitable' purposes). There are specific regular pitfalls that very high volume presents but I have developed means to countering them - as well as exploiting them in other players who play more tables than they can profitably handle. Actually to the extent where I think I have made their lives hell and want to kill themselves.
Also drugs. And Chi.
edit: how many hands/hour do boku87 and nanonoko get through? Aren't they considered to have good edges in high volume?
Last edited by Mt.FishNoob; 06-23-2014 at 12:13 PM.