Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** ****Official Stars Regulars Thread****

09-20-2012 , 06:35 AM
^na, it sounds pretty stupid imo
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-20-2012 , 08:01 PM
Today doesnt seem to be my day ;/ all plo100

****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-20-2012 , 08:10 PM
=/

are you going for SNE?
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-20-2012 , 08:20 PM
Nah, just clearing the 200k Milestone. Played on other sites

Enjoying the grind, stars is the nuts
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-21-2012 , 09:43 AM
yeah, i love zoom

playing 100zoom with a 3fig balance is really fun
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-21-2012 , 10:14 AM
switched from zoom to normal tables. more hands/hr 12-18 tabling and i dont like the tight dynamics so much in zoom, although the comfort is awesome
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-21-2012 , 10:25 AM
i think the 100 isnt that tight, the 50 is just absurd nutpeddling tho
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-21-2012 , 02:12 PM
i've lost about 20 BI playing .5/1ZOOM on my cell phone.
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-21-2012 , 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nachunja
i've lost about 20 BI playing .5/1ZOOM on my cell phone.
had u fun atleast!?

played once 200 on cell phone, won 1k, wondered why everyone is that loose/bad. realized later that it was playmoney!^^
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-21-2012 , 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by F3rz3nd3
had u fun atleast!?

played once 200 on cell phone, won 1k, wondered why everyone is that loose/bad. realized later that it was playmoney!^^
LOL
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-22-2012 , 03:47 AM
yeah 50 zoom i've noticed is wayyyy tighter than 25 zoom. i've taken to starting 50plo games (deep and regular) over playing zoom 50PL. probably better anyhow if i'm going to relearn transitioning to midstakes PLO.
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-25-2012 , 09:36 AM
Hello all,

In the beginning of august we floated the idea of combining the fast- and normal speed tables into one singular table type.

After listening to feedback from the players, we have now come up with a proposal that we think would go over well with most players, but before implementing it, we again ask for your feedback.



Thanks,
Baard
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-25-2012 , 02:59 PM
seems good.
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-25-2012 , 06:18 PM
I prefer the way "normal" tables are now, changing the muck time from 3 seconds to 2 is good though. It's because on average my decisions take probably ~5 seconds, but occasionally being able to think for 25 - 35 seconds, especially on the river, is nice. I do however feel that users who habitually "abuse" the system and take much longer than should be required have less time to act than other players, similar to how PokerStars plans to ( or already does?) limit/increase the amount of tables a player can play on a player specific basis.
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-25-2012 , 06:25 PM
looks good
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-28-2012 , 01:34 AM
anyone play plo10 deep regularly?
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-28-2012 , 07:14 PM
I emailed stars on this issue, and I really really want the normal speed tables. Multitabling fast tables is impossible for me and it will suck to an extreme amount when you lower the time bank since it will decrease my maximum amount of tables. Every second less than the normal speed tables are bad so please lower the time bank as little as possible.
The Doctor
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-28-2012 , 07:41 PM
i think a part of why they are doing this is to reduce the number of tables people that use the full time on normal tables play
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-30-2012 , 02:03 AM
Maybe running bad is just related to karma :

petcleaner: legit worst player on stars
petcleaner: $10k over expectation every session

Last edited by napsus; 09-30-2012 at 03:59 AM.
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-30-2012 , 02:17 AM
dude what are you talking about? you have no idea of my history with him

he isnt a fish, and he is constantly abusive to me and others

i have never started attacking someone on stars without provocation in my life
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-30-2012 , 02:18 AM
im trying to tilt him enough that he ****s off. and i dont know why you would get involved knowing nothing about it.
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-30-2012 , 02:25 AM
and please edit my name out of that post.
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-30-2012 , 04:31 AM
lolololol
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-30-2012 , 04:56 AM
so i feel like i need to defend myself, so ill post the full story here.

first up guy is 40/23, doesnt play that often, i has him at:



obv its a micro-sample size and he has run ridiculously over expectation, but i doubt he is much worse than a marginal loser. he certainly leeches from the games relative to rake, and his style is particularly annoying to mt regs.

my main issue tho is that when he runs even a tiny bit bad he berates people (myself included), educates fish, etc. this guy is terrible for the games.

when i choose to troll someone on stars i dont really pay attention to how they are playing, or what the hand was. i just wait to win or lose a hand (whichever is relevant), and then troll them the same way they do to other people. thats all i was doing here. the aim is that either they realise how annoying it is so stop doing it, get tilted and play badly, or even in a best case scenario quit and dont come back.

for further context, in case anyone thinks im lying and was just tilted, here is my month: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...24&postcount=6. unlikely imo.
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote
09-30-2012 , 05:13 AM
Yeah we talked on the table and I thought he said that to a fish (guy was playing in a weird way, no auto rebuy, ...) and I was pretty tilted to.

Anyway, that's obviously ok and I'm sorry about that, but I wouldn't be if vilain was a huge fish.

And grats for the month
****Official Stars Regulars Thread**** Quote

      
m