We are playing a 2.00 pot limit Omaha ring game. We min raise in EP with
AQJ7 double suited. The button with a 40 cents stack 3 bets to 17 cents. The small blind with a 2.00 stack calls the three bet and so do we. My game plan was to ignore the short stacked button and get value from the small blind. Flop comes A73 with two spades (we don't have spades). The small blind checks, we check, button jams and the small blind calls. At this point I'm thinking we may lose to the buttons aces but we could recoup our loses versus the small blind; hence we call. The turn is a Jack (non spade). The small blind checks and we fire half pot. The small blind puts us all in and we call.
Question 1: is this a fold preflop?
Question 2: was my logic flawed targeting the small blind after the flop?
Question 3: is this a fold on the turn check raise?

All depends on some things. How deep are you with small blind. How bad are they. How loose does Button 3bet. A 3bet isnt always aces.

Q1: If you would be deep with button you could call him even if you knew he always has aces (u play perfect against it). If you know its aces almost always and he is short. just fold

Q2: If you, like i said above, know that button has aces you shouldnt call to target the small blind. There will be many flops that button just shoves and SB just folds. But as played now... when small blind calls on the flop, your logic is fine, but mostly if u think u can get value from him. So basically you need to raise or bet the turn to get his money in sidepot. But honestly I would be happy to just raise the flop if button is so short 'cos i qouldnt believe he has aces everytime and it is no big mistake if he is short.

Q3. turn obv fine.

im so tired i dont know what i wrote now, gonna check again after sleep.lol