So, I like this hand because I'm learning a lot studying it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IntheFold
Does 6789hearts lead out for a bet?
I think it depends on if we have a leading strategy at all. Obviously if pure check then no, and this is probably what I would be doing in game.
But Flophero actually likes betting about 12% of it's range here, and this is why it would be a pure check for me because I'm not studied enough to know what that 12% looks like.
Value Range:
- It appears it wants to be hands like top two, as it's betting 66% of the T6 combos. Betting without the flush, checking with the flush.
- T3 - it bets 100% but it only has this rarely, AAT3, AKT3ds, AQT3ds - and note that the ds hands cannot have hearts as it would never 3bet AxKxTy3y
Bluff Range:
- 78hh
- 98hh
- 987hh
- 54hh
- hh without a T seems to be a strong bet, especially with the Ah or Kh, but if we have a T then we are leaning towards check strongly.
So, we have more "bluff" hands than we have value hands in our betting range, which I believe is correct theoretically. But we are mostly checking here, with like 90% of our range, so keep that in mind.
For A
A
T
6
is a pure check actually - it's simply too strong and we block too much of the continuing range of our opponents. The same hand, without the hearts, or with just a single heart, is a bet.
So, I think I can begin to incorporate betting these spots in a balanced way now that I've looked at this.
edit: I think 2+2, and the population, is strongly misplaying this type of situation. It looks like a lot would get this hand right, but that's because it's a bottom of range type hand.