Any start date set for this yet?

I'd like to book whatever you have left, but I do intend to play the 10/20 deep games. Let me know how much action I can get.

i think the 70k min hands is a good addition. if you would like to have me back I am willing to bet 20k to your 10k

eskabor if I can't get back in the bet I would be willing to bet against you up to 20k

Just chiming in to say that I think it's unfair if people like Ben, Ike, non-reg higher stakers etc play a bunch in these games as it massively swings the EV of the bet, and if that is gunna happen I think it should be well within Yarney's right to call it off

^Yarny already said it's fine for this to happen. It's not unfair if he makes the bet after explicitly acknowledging he's fine with it.

If there's side-betting going on with good escrows my 2k is probably interested again. Not going to lie, ike and ben trying to take as much action as they can has swayed me a little bit

Willing to bet 5k (vs 2.5k), if yarny is sold out lmk people interested betting his side.

(Also smaller amounts)

lol, me too.

if its still some action left, i bet 2k vs 1k. (or i take some betside if someoen wants )

I will offer $1050 against your $2000 if you want.

its funny to see people wanting their action back now ike and ben chime in, not that i think they would waste their time following me around 24/7 for like 20-30k ( i think that's the max action i have left ) but they are zoom 25/50 regs, and do dabble in the 10/20 ante's , i think playing a ton of hands lower than that would be a bit unfair. i definitely don't want the bet to be can a few regs stop me from making 10000bb in 31days, because im sure they can.


when i made this thread i thought everyone would be biting my hand off for action and i would get it started pretty soon, for personal reasons im going to have to start it September 5-7th , kind of a let down , but we can get a firm set of rules to make sure nothing can go wrong , im happy to escrow my portion of the money , checking my transfer limits i figure this is going to take a few weeks anyways.

Just in time for WCOOP

i think we can just put a rule that no angle can be shot, judges decide the outcome, i plan to win 10000bb legitimately , within the rules of pokerstars T&C's, ( i don't have a script and wont be using one )

haha how convenient

lol it might be because of what I said to you but i think you would have realized it eventually


looks like your plans magically went away

haha it does make sense !! but in all honesty, my house is being demolished in 5 weeks and I have a family holiday in 6, that's why I was going travelling , and still am

updated terms/interest list

I am also interested for betting 2k if there is still space open, thanks.

I have one more suggestion, could there be a limit on how many bigblinds you can win from 1 player. I see you playing a lot of headsup vs same player. I know you are trying to just start tables, but I think it would look a bit shady if a big procentage of winnings came from the same guy. The limit could be something like 3000bb's vs player x and after that winnings from player x doesnt count. (maybe hu-hands only).

I wouldn't suspect the people that are playing hu against yaaarny to collude. They are all very well know people. Only would be weird if a new guy shows up.

A question,
What does the 70k minimun hands mean? If he plays less he loses the bet or is it a wash than?

what if he loses >30buyins to one person, do they not count after 30?

I'm interested in booking action as well if there's any left.

-if he plays less than 70k hands, he loses automatically.
-the results count only after 70k hand mark.
--if he is above 10.000bb winnings before hitting 70k hand mark, it doesn't count.
--he only wins the bet if he is up 10.000bb after having played 70k hands.

There is a ton of action on this. With so many hsplo regs betting, and such a small player pool at 5-10+, shouldn't there be some sort of stipulation against players taking extra time, slowing down the action, colluding against etc?

Yaarny wrote that if a bunch of hs regs wanted to keep him from winning this bet they probably could (imagine if ike and ben follows him around at every table).

Him betting vs as few HS regs as possible, and ones he feels he can trust, obviously lowers the chance of this.

I don't intend to follow him around. I won't play below 10/20. I wanted to make it clear ahead of time that I was going to play some 10/20 if there were 4+ tables running frequently in the next 31 days. I figured that was the best approach to prevent any "going against the spirit of the bet" kind of stuff.