It's funny that most people are either super lazy or simply don't read anything writes. That said with ante tables involved I think nearly everyone is going to decide against this given that +40/50BI days would be too likely etc. I hope it happens would be a good rail but with the ante's allowed rule & 100BI I think this will fall flat.

+1 to the bolded part, it's fun to follow this herd behavior

OP updated at YaAaRnY's request with the suggested rules so that it's clear for everyone

Hmm what I am confused about still is if yaaarny plays deep, what is the size of 1 BI? Max buy or 100bb?

Also if he plays 25/50 on an odd day...will 1 BI for that stake be considered as 1 BI or will the monies be converted in terms of 5/10 reg table BIs?

surely I have the same % to lose 40 buyins as I do to win ? this is why we agree too 2:1 because If I tried this bet a million times , I think 2:1 is profitable for me and you don't ?

short term variance is w/e if I win the bet , doesn't mean you made a bad bet, I don't even think 2:1 is profitable for me though, I think its close, I wanna push myself to see if I can do something , the money is meaningless to me , the challenge is what im after.

if everyone can confirm if they want to bet and how much , Ike has agreed to be escrow, I also sent him a PM seeing if he would mind being the judge I send my hands too, to be the one to verify if I do achieve 100 buyins , I don't know him personally but I think he is the best candidate possible.


if you guys don't wanna bet, il have my month back

1BI = 100bb at all tables, so it's clearer to say that the bet is to make 10.000bb in 31 days.

the bet is measured only in bb, so 100bb at 5/10 is just as valuable as 100bb at 25/50

maybe I shouldn't have used buyins , 100 big blinds = 1 buy in, I need to make 10000 big blinds, which is 100 buyins , so at nl 1k , it would be 100k

Meh I'll risk it. Let's go 10k

updated OP with this too

letting you know that i might chicken out too or lower my bet from 10k to 5k.. will decide 1-2 days b4 this thing starts

What is annoying me is the 2k plo deep which equivalent would be the std 5k so its ruining all the math. Sorry Im out as well

Its interesting how some people are bailing out because "zoom is allowed". You guys do realize that zoom 1k and 2k NEVER runs. So the only zoom he might play is at 5k. And I dont think that game is softer than regular 1k by any means.

its not because of zoom its because of deep ante tables

More reason to leave deep tables out where it mostly matters how good/bad you gonna run over such a short period.

What odds would people find fair for 100, 150 & 200 BI at 2/4+ ?

I'd be thinking of something like 2:1 / 3.5:1 / 5:1

Joey, get in here and gif this comment

Lol question, But what If OP first loses 50bi and then wins 100bi?

then he is up 50bi

Joey, get in here and gif this comment

u have to look deeper than that. its like when i first noticed that ur avatar moves

lol. great

200bi is ridiculous hard and i think nobody posting in this thread made this one time at 5/10+.


dp made this at 2/4 whne games were easier. 2/4 4 years ago was very soft if compared to 2014 5/10+. people gave dpred 3:1 at softer games ... i mean, A LOT easier.

ya this nits chickening are tilting. they only want bets when they are 99% favorite...

the bet its hard, and at 2:1 its a good bet to bet against. do you think yarny makes 100bi + 4 months per year ?

how many times in your life anyone here made 100bi in one month ? its a hard bet. def possible, but hard. thats why 2:1 is fair.

by the way, those guys who buy in 250bbs at 10/20 are very good players. yarny might lose a lot too.

the bet would be better at 1.5 to 1

Not meaning to hijack, but where this cast from Joey? Can't find it on pokertube.

I think main reason yaaarny needs deep tables is rcause of lack of action...ps usually has 1-3 tables tops running and at least 1 is always deep