I had to take a longer break. But I went back to the game and started to play the spins again. How does the soft treat me now?
I played spins a year, two years ago and I have never had a swing like this before. I know it's just barely over 500 spins, but I'm already 35.000 chips below ev! In combination with hypers I played few months ago we have a massacre!
I know that here are very active p* p.r. workers so I am directing my comments to minded and impartial forum members. P * is constantly changing its policy towards players. They simply segregate them into better and worse ones. Better gives smaller rake, weaker bigger. How is it possible in the European Union, where every entrepreneur must treat each client in the same way? If I go to the grocery store and have a certain sum of money, I will not get more or less food, just because I'm thicker or more hungry, etc. An entrepreneur must treat everyone equally, and p * treats everyone as they like! If they manipulate the return of rake, can anyone guarantee that they do not manipulate a game of poker in the same way? I did not pay any money for p * for around 5 years. Maybe this is the reason? We need money in circulation, so you can not only withdraw money because we will make you a pulp at the tables
You write: play more, you need a big sample - 10,000, 20000 tournaments. I lost some 200, 300bi only because of the software! This is incompatible with any mathematical intuition and "laws" that rule probability. If p * can not propose a game that does not guarantee a real reflection of the game, do not let it be called poker. Poker is not just a game in which full wins with a straight and a color with two pairs. Poker is also a game in which AA wins pre-flop with any hand in 85% of cases. Not in 80%, 81%, 83%, only in 85%. If P * can not guarantee it in a large enough sample, do not let this game be called poker! The appropriate authorities should look at them.