Quote:
Originally Posted by Alobar
There are only 5 states that have no cities with over 100K people in them. Otherwise the biggest city in practically any state is going to be preferable to living in Cleveland or Cinci
I lived in Nashville, TN for over a decade, and when it was clear I was moving (for my wife's job) the candidates were Cincy, St. Louis, Philly, Denver, and San Fran. During her search I told her jokingly - kind of jokingly! - I'm not moving to ****ing Cincinnati. Guess where I've lived the past few years?
Ohio people are certified nuts, and since Cincy is a state border city it gets all the Kentucky jokes too, but... I've been back to Nashville several times, and I'm pretty happy we're not there anymore. It's loads more expensive, crowded, pretentious, and everything that made it awesome in, say, 2008 is gone. I'd bet Denver is the same. So if you gave me a random choice between Denver/Nashville and Cincy... I'd think real hard and probably choose Denver. But I'd deliberate! And not snap choose not-Ohio.
I've also lived in South Dakota and Utah and grew up in St. Louis. People putting "major" metro areas in states like SD or WY or MT on par with metro areas in OH are probably not informed or not realistic.