Quote:
Originally Posted by ElSapo
I've been thinking about this a lot lately. ... Just because we've managed to overpopulate the planet doesn't mean the violence going on around the world is somehow less awful. There is violence and suffering virtually everywhere. So what if most of the 7 billion people don't see it.
I don't think peace relative to population is the right way to look at things.
I’m not at all convinced that the planet is overpopulated. Life expectancy at birth is now around 71 years, compared to somewhere around 58 in 1960, so we seem to be doing an okay job feeding and otherwise supporting our population. And I actually agree that the average level of worldwide happiness is at an all-time high, although I have no clinical proof for that supposition. I just think that the historically upward trend line of life expectancy and the historically downward trend of average violence say absolutely nothing about what will happen in the future, and to think otherwise is a dangerous fallacy.
I suspect that technology will eventually be able to solve the antibiotic resistance problem, or most of the other potential disasters out there. But I have doubts as to whether we’re capable as a society of solving all of those in a sufficiently timely way to avoid them all.
I don’t see any realistic solution to nuclear proliferation. It’s 1945 technology.