Quote:
Originally Posted by daveT
I think there is another huge difference. I'm only going by impression, which seemed confirmed by this thread.
In Europe, they hold onto tradition. There are even laws about what you can call food, from what I understand. It seems that the going Euro opinion is that centuries of tradition and mystery are highly valued.
The US is pretty divided on this. Some people are deeply steeped in tradition, so you have soul food and Cajun food as examples that aren't really touched. Foreign foods are also popular here, though how genuine it is can be a matter of degree.
Then you have others who are all about the hybrid, so you end up with CalMex, TexMex, Southern-[whatever], and so on. Then you have some wild hybrids that aren't really able to be put into a bucket. The spirit of experimentation is rich and varied.
A typical American cooks simple, dependable dishes that's been passed down over the generations. At a typical restaurant, we are eating things we could have cooked at home, like spaghetti and meatballs.
It's not often we are going out to try the newest insane invention. That world is for the "foodie" world. I'd guess that, if you asked 100 Americans, 95 of them has never ate at these places.
I think the hybrid stuff feeds back into the notion of innovation. Americans are among the best at innovating but crucially the most open to innovation, and they have the best brains and resources to do it. I agree that Europe in the main holds onto traditions more, but I believe that is changing in parts, particularly when the tradition was never that defined.
London's cuisine for instance has never been too refined or defined beyond the sort of stuff you wouldn't normally go out and eat for a special occasion (pie and mash, fish and chips, steak pudding etc) which means there was way more room to innovate and create its own identity. Same goes for some Scandinavian countries which have also burst onto the food scene relatively recently.
A country like Italy on the other hand is full of regional specialities that are beloved and people have been sitting down to eat for many, many years, so there is more reluctance to change and experiment there.
For me, sometimes tradition is just something so entrenched in the area that it is a wonderful thing to experience, and I can totally understand why people want to hold onto it. I went skiing in Austria in March and I ate a garmknodel.
It's a yeast dumpling filled with plum jam and served with vanilla custard; a stodgy, sticky mess of carbohydrates and sugar and topped with poppy seeds and more sugar. It's resolutely unfashionable by today's eating trends and absolutely delicious. It also hasn't changed one bit since i ate the same dish when I was ten years old in a different resort 30 miles away, and I hope it won't have changed 25 years from now. Those sorts of experiences are magical - it took me back to a time I never thought I could recapture.
Would be interesting to hear any Americans weigh in on their own thoughts about tradition vs innovation, particularly if they live in an area of the US where tradition is valued higher, but also if there are instances where tradition and innovation can live side by side.
Last edited by SandraXII; 07-29-2018 at 02:03 AM.