Quote:
Originally Posted by ninetynine99
Gotta chuckle at how often proudfootz takes some random non-fact and emphatically states it "proves" something:
Gotta chuckle at someone taking a demonstrated fact and trying to peddle the nonsense idea that it is a 'random non-fact'. Much like your garden variety doubter of climate change or a typical Holocaust denier.
Quote:
No it doesn't.
Along with weak-ass assertions such as this:
The NOVA reconstruction proves it would have exited the chest.
What "evidence" leads to such a concrete conclusion?
Just to clarify - the image of the trajectory going through the body from the actual back wound location came from the
Discovery Channel re-enactment (the
NOVA TV show only did a cartoon version placing the entrance in the
neck instead of the
back - a blatant lie from the producers of that program. Sadly, some folks swear by this stuff even after they are informed that they've been deceived.).
Which does indeed demonstrate conclusively that on
that trajectory would exit the
chest and not the
throat:
Only a few fringe types actually take the Magic Bullet theory seriously.
Quote:
Virtually all of your statements itt point to only one conclusion: you are a conspiracist nut job.
The fact that you are jumping to the defense of something that has been definitively debunked tells us more about your own predilection for nutjobbery than anything else.
Last edited by proudfootz; 09-19-2017 at 10:53 AM.