Quote:
Originally Posted by Bighurt52235
Dave,
Youre being really odd about the phone thing. You dont need a magazine cover quality photo to take a pic of a UFO.
I myself have photographed various discernable objects with my phone.
Maybe you don't need a magazine quality photo, but as the saying goes: "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
If a photo has any reasonable doubt attached to it, it's going to (correctly) be dismissed out of hand.
This means that you have to have a stable, close-up, image of a UFO in broad daylight. The UFO can't be moving across the sky, it can't be too far away, etc, because that diminishes the quality of the photo or video. And don't even think about pushing that through PhotoShop to fix it.
The odds of having a UFO just chilling perfectly still in the sky 100ft above your head for 10 minutes while you take the time to adjust for angle, direct sunlight, shadows, and so on sounds like super low odds, don't you agree?
This is the problem. We, as consumers, are so used to seeing simple photos on the internet that we don't really appreciate how the conditions are optimized from the phone to the poster only pushing up 1/10th of the photos they've taken. We also don't quite comprehend that many of the amazing photos we see are are taken on high-quality DSL cameras and pushed through photoshop.