Quote:
Originally Posted by dalerobk2
I have never heard of that. I guess the rule of thumb I would use is if a person's wages primarily come from tips then you should tip them when they do work for you. Does that not seem reasonable?
Yes, it does. I ask because I spend the majority of my time in the U.S. in California, and sometimes I wonder if I should take the minimum wage issue into account when tipping.
There seems to be a fairly common misperception that all servers in the U.S. make $2.13 an hour plus tips. The truth is that the $2.13 figure is a federal minimum and the state minimum is higher in most states (often much higher.)
See chart.
In addition to this, every server is guaranteed the same minimum wage as any other employee in his state, and if his tips don't get him to that amount, the employer must make up the difference. So no one is ever making less than minimum wage, no matter how ****tily their customers tip them. But the reality is that almost never comes into play, because practically every server at the Denny's level and above is getting tipped enough to exceed the minimum wage.
So my waiter at Morton's in Los Angeles is getting $8.00 an hour plus tips, while my waiter at Morton's in Atlanta gets $2.13 an hour plus (presumably very similar) tips, for doing exactly the same job. I'm already paying higher menu prices in LA to help pay the servers' higher salary. The question is: Should I tip more in Atlanta and less in LA, in the interest of fairness? Or is it none of my concern how much the restaurant pays its servers? I'm still undecided.
Last edited by Minimalist; 05-12-2014 at 05:30 PM.