Quote:
Originally Posted by mullen
10% is no longer a reasonable tip, it has just progressed that way over time. That is why auto grats are 18%, my tip out example is based upon servers getting 18% tips, etc. You're a freeloader because you're breaking the implied contract when you go out to eat you should be paying what the standard acceptable tip is, even if you do not agree with it. If you don't agree with the standard, you shouldn't be going out to eat. You're just relying on other people to subsidize your meal, and even so, if someone decides to leave a 23% tip because of outstanding service, that should go in the waiter's pocket as a reward for excellent service, not to offset your bad tip.
Your GF is a cocktail waitress - I can't just get hammered off her free drinks and give her $1 at the end and say I'm not cheap or freeloading because I gave a tip. I need to give the standard one.
What's reasonable is subjective. But for a moment, forget about what I think is reasonable and forget what you think is reasonable. Forget about what I personally would tip or hypothetically tip. Forget what somebody should tip or what tips are standard. To suggest that people who don't agree to perceived standard tips should not eat out and just stay home is ignorant. You are cutting your own throat. This is why I brought up price discrimination in the first place (though others refuse to accept how it applies to tipping, I think that just has more to do with that they just refuse to listen because it came from me). The principle of price discrimination is not about who should pay what, it's about extracting the most $ out of all of them. We have identified that who'd tip below the tip out rates do not contribute to overall more money. Wutang lost about 13 cents because of his 4% tipping couple, so ok, they can stay home. But when $4.60 is the most somebody is willing to give and it is available to you, why send them home because it's not $12.60 (this is from your prior scenario, post tip out from $10 and $18 tips on $100)? Sure you like $12.60 better than $4.60, but wouldn't you also like $4.60 better than $0? The reasonable answer would be yes.
And while we're at it, to show the other side too, if somebody was willing to tip 23% (on $100 tab) for outstanding service, that's $17.60 (post tip out) they're willing to give which is available due to price discrimination. If you do not allow for discriminating prices with tipping and substitute with a flat 18% automatic gratuity policy, you're now turning down those who would otherwise be willing to give you $17.60 in favor of $12.60. Limiting oneself to less when they could have more is unreasonable.
Though there seems to be misconceptions that I oppose tipping. I am not an advocate against tipping. I am very much in favor of tipping and the option of choice. And that's not necessarily because I get to choose a cheap tip. Though I admit I tip on the cheaper side, it's definitely not that far as approaching 'freeloader' range (unless freeloader is all inclusive to everyone who tips <18%, because 18% can't be the freeloader threshold, but if it is, that is beyond utterly unreasonable). That $10 tip on the $100 bill, that was originated from mullen's hypothetical. Though I do believe if one were to tip 10% in that spot it would still be reasonable, it is not what I did suggest or would suggest.