Quote:
Originally Posted by El Diablo
asdf,
Lots of staff also have some latitude in comping regulars and nice guests a reasonable amount of stuff (a free round every few, etc). But yeah, it's mainly stealing of course.
I've had three bar jobs. One was a corporate place where comping was definitely frowned upon, and I didn't do it much, maybe once a while if someone was spending a lot. The other two were independent, local-type places, and I was most definitely encouraged by the boss/owner to comp drinks. More than that, I was given carte blanche to use my judgment about it, and if anything, they would have been annoyed if I wasn't comping regulars or good new patrons. Thinking about now and in the context of this thread, I'm sad to think that many of the people I comped assumed I was ripping off my bosses (both of whom were friends), but that probably was the assumption.
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
There are two problems people forget about when considering the effect of how we in the US pay restaurant servers, relying heavily on tips:
First, it means there is in effect a much lower minimum wage for some servers than for others. Bartender or cocktail waitress in a busy, not-scuzzy place? You do fine. Waitress at Waffle House? Good luck feeding your kids. This is true not because we tip, but because almost everyone has become acclimated to tipping as a percentage (which varies from person to person, but when you include the non-tippers probably averages out to something on the order of 10%) of the bill, plus rounding up in the case of small, frequent purchases like drinks. And yes, I get the argument that the person in the nice place has fewer tables (probably true), splits tips with someone else (often true) and works harder and does a better job (****ing bull****, and that's from someone who used to wait tables at a nice place) than the person at the ****ty place, and the argument that everyone's free to seek every job (which is sort of true but a long conversation). My point is that with compensation as it is, Waffle House can pay its server an effective $6 an hour, while the fancy bar cannot pay its servers anything less than a few times that. This is dumb — we should decide what the minimum wage is (if there is one; obviously most of us think there should be) and apply it to everyone.
I'm not going to go to bat for tipping as a societal custom or a way of paying restaurant workers, but I don't think the above is a very good critique of it. For one thing, name me an industry that doesn't apportion wages unevenly among people doing essentially the same job, in favor of employees at the better jobs. Is the idea that all servers should make the same amount, or close to it?
For another thing, servers at high end restaurants are actually more skilled than Flo at Waffle House. They have a different skillset and knowledge base (wine knowledge, for example). I agree that Flo probably works as hard or harder, but again, pay in most sectors is not usually commensurate with difficulty of labor, it's commensurate with some combination of skill specialization, career experience and preferment.