Can we ban 6ix from this thread at least?

JFC no, he'll **** over other threads.

He’ll tire of this eventually. The first and second laws of thermodynamics prevent a perpetual motion excrement machine.

Lol. That's funny.

Of course it is. That's why this thread has went the way it has.

Oh

lonely_dumb_bitch,


For example, I've offered more than once to literally pay/donate-to-charity/gofundme/etc in exchange for a number of different simple tasks that have yet to be completed. The most recent was this:


Now, you have 3 choices:

1. Quote the post and ask him to walk me through his thought processes of that one, which will directly help the cause/victims he and you claim to believe in/care about. (interesting)

2. Explain why you won't in sufficient detail. (also interesting)

3. Ignore this either with no reply, or, a reply of two sentences of the dumbest **** imaginable. (boring af)

Yep.


Don't get me wrong, I do partially think you guys are this stupid, but, it's also a bunch of obfuscation and dissembling and disingenuousness. Because you really want to believe some stupid **** but have no way to handle the correct and factual opposing viewpoint.

That Phresh realized this and immediately stopped talking and started begging to have me banned probably does make him the smartest guy in the room.

Lol remember this:

Interesting

*gone

Wow #3 it is that's so unexpected!

Imagine if the roles were reversed and you all were offering to donate to Rescue-A-Pit or Kill-A-Toddler. That's so surreal.


And that's almost proof you all are not trolling, which, is double surreal lol. I mean, imagine the bragging rights to say you trolled a dude so hard you got him to donate to Kill-A-Pit for almost literally nothing in return.

Anyhow, these people are wild:

https://www.reddit.com/r/BanPitBulls...og_attacks_in/






So deranged they don't even realize it helps their cause.

The world continues to be a confusing and strange place for you, doesn’t it? Do you find that the substances that you abuse help or hinder you in understanding your surroundings? You might find that you are able to generate some positive social relationships if you cut back.

p.s.

http://web.archive.org/web/201808250..._United_States

That's the wikipedia page they were screeching about getting deleted.




On one hand I can see why they'd want to delete it, and why the pet-murder-cult would want it to stay, but, it's all lowest-common-denominator ****. The cultists either believe, or want others to believe, that dogs didn't attack and kill people before Pit Bulls. And the wikipedia people wouldn't want a page up that would bolster somebody's ludicrously unscientific claims.

But I didn't fathom anybody could actually think that until very recently. I'd want the page up so I could say, look, do you honestly think a dog didn't kill a person before 1887? Then not again until 4 years later? Are you ****ing with me? What technological advancement happened around then, and what technological advancement happened around 30 years ago?

If only there were pet murder cultists here to share their thought in a vigorous and little fun discussion.

They're really out here thinking that we had a sick good run of hundreds (or tens of thousands depending on how we're tracking it) of years until that one little dog came around in 1887 and ****ed everything up.

In the same vein, I realized that I wasn't alone in underestimating the absolute gulf of ignorance and stupidity of the pet murder cultists. I'd assume the majority of pro-pit-bull people have made arguments that look really weird on their face, because, the people are assuming at least some bare minimum of knowledge.

Of course it might look like people don't care about the attacks on animals and humans if the other side somehow thinks that dogs only starting doing a bit of that ultraviolence a few decades ago and even wilder that they believe this based on wikipedia collecting newspaper clippings.

The other big one is the concept of breeds (i'd say the three big ones are: the 'proportionate' idea with the numbers, the fatalities by year statistics, and the breed concept). Some information:

1. The majority of dogs are not purebred breeds. Worldwide it's estimated to be as high as 80%.

2. Any purebred anything is not good. There will be some level of detrimental inbreeding. A non-breed dog will be healthier and happier.

3. Even assuming the idea, for the sake of argument, that psychological behavioral traits can be bred for, different breeds are more tightly bred than others. The less strict the breeding and the less extreme the breeding (for size and shape, as it diverges from the actual size and shape of what a non-bred dog will tend to) will result in a looser breed standard and thus a diluted gene expression, with less confidence in being able to say x breed behaves like y. A breed standard is not a scientific document.

4. I really thought this would be, if not common knowledge, at least knowledge one would want to have if they're arguing the justification for murdering pets and quite frankly it is a little disturbing that the frame of reference for the cultists is breed-normative.

World chaos, world feeeaaaahh!

The distress of nations with perplexity.

Compelling!

https://www.reddit.com/r/BanPitBulls...vs_pit_nutter/

holy ****ing cringe lol