Remember, that was you, saying it is offensive to mention that both dogs and people have legs.




But, you don't.

And I suspect that you guys get a sense that a good troll attempt is to keep teasing me by pretending to be interested in things (even if you aren't able to articulate this sense like so). Then, bam, surprise, you're ret4rded not possessing any intellectual curiosity about anything. Got me again.

The problem is that my radical sincerity is unbreakable, so, the troll attempts will never really work. I am willing to talk about literally anything here (I mean, lol, assuming it's at least kinda sorta tangentially related to dogs or anything meta; this thoroughly qualifies).

But, you're not. This has been demonstrated numerous times already, where you (all) behaved as though you were calling my bluff, and (to really strain the analogy) proceeded to crow about how you knew I was bluffing whilst I'm raking in the pot. Regardless, in bullet points lol:

• I'm not "fixated with (on) 'black boys'".
  
• All those references are the same, referencing the same thing.
  
• There is a human living in the world. He uses the screenname "Jman420" on some social media.
  
• He also, apparently, uses the screenname "Einstein2" on some social media.
  
• He is a fascist prosecutor who has sent innocent people to jail.
  
• He has shown less than no remorse for this, as his fake, histrionic, now-deleted remorse post only highlighted this lack of remorse. That's merely a footnote though, in this context.
  
• Your name here is "Einstein2". You are him. You deny this. That is fine.
  
• I am merely "fixated" on you denying how obvious that is, for lack of a better word.

This shouldn't need to be explained. If I said you were Walt Disney, and you denied it, and I went on to make a bunch of references to Mickey Mouse, there would have to be something deeply wrong with your brain to think I was fixated on Disney Characters and not you being Walt Disney.

More bullet points:

• There is an online community for any and everything, of all sizes and shapes. In one community, my friends and I share interesting and funny and entertaining things we see on the internet. This thread qualifies. Explaining the contents of that first set of bullet points quite clearly qualifies. They think even less of you than I do.
  
• There is no way that concept is news to you, specifically or generally.

Even more bullet points:

• I don't know if there is an invisible fan club cheering me on, and whether or not the same innocent people you sent to jail are part of this fan club.
  
• If there was a fan club and we could see it, then it would, by definition, not be invisible.
  
• You are a horrifically stupid man.

In before,

In before you post that again?

But I'm not. If you could remotely articulate how and why, you would've done so already. If you could make up a fake explanation that at least sounds roughly plausible even, you would've done so already. Nobody here can.

With you specifically, you're not even respecting yourself enough to read the words I'm typing. I'm not even making an argument yet at this point:




I even highlighted it so there'd be no confusion. I was so convinced there'd be no confusion that I initially even misread your reply.

And, if you're referring to some other "argument" "I've made" then everything I've typed applies to that as well.

What a great and well-thought-out question. It's contributions like yours that have made this website, the 2p2 forums, continue to thrive over the years.

I like how I remembered some clever and funny poster from over a decade ago and you were just ****ing adamant my memory was faulty.

I feel like you're being sarcastic

I wonder if another 24k worthless posts will save the forums. You could break them up in to shorter posts, like I do, so there are more overall clicks, but, you already seem to get tired and confused after a couple sentences.

You could still try though.

Why not?

It's worth a shot.

I am. We could talk about your utter worthlessness and how you probably don't even give a **** about dogs and pit bull type dogs, you just latched on to what appeared to be a correct ingroup mocking an incorrect outgroup (oops!) to fill some emptiness you might not even be aware exists, and, like, it could be a whole big interesting discussion and a bunch of posters could participate and the death spiral of these forums could reverse itself with all the vigorous debate and a little fun that would be taking place.

But that might be a paradox.

I don't think we ever get more than a 3 banger out of this Einstein guy.

Russell’s Paradox….. look it up.

Other potentially interesting discussion topics:

1. We could talk about how you guys, being so horny to be part of a group laughing and pointing at somebody, are inadvertently being very cruel to people like Phresh. He actually seems to care about this topic, like, he sees the dead children (and other things related, that might've happened to him personally) and even though he can't process the math and science behind what he's looking at, it does cause him pain, and, he needs an outlet for that pain. It seems to have broken his brain. And if you respected him, you might realize that saying things like "it's racist to say that dogs and humans both have legs" doesn't really help the situation.

I could share another fun story about when me and Trolly were "friends" lol.

Fun fact, Bertrand Russell also made this famous cartoon depicting the infamous stabbiness of the Irishman:

Actually though, and I think you'll agree, it's a sad state of affairs when you have to add the part about looking it up, knowing that the current default is drooling crosseyededly at the screen.

In my day, dudes were absolutely horny to look things up, even if it meant just skimming a wikipedia article so they could PWN somebody online and then forgetting it immediately afterwards.

Compelling!

did Russell at some point regret dedicating so much of his life to fancy lad philosophizing os? Might've been another philosopher.. I remember hearing something along those lines

lol the stabbiness of regret

Everyone has regrets.

Wasn't there some thing going around online supposedly from Karl Rove wherein he described How To Troll as a way to to inundate a space with certain talking points under the guise of actual debate and discussion?

Except this isn't the same venue with the same context (though, as an aside {and how absurd to speak of Dog Talk as an aside at this point} KingOfFelt and Phresh have done this with Dog Talk) so either Jman is real real dumb or it's more like this:



Probably a mixed bag.

Your parents definitely do lol God in heaven Lord have mercy.

This btw:

https://archive.is/aDxHk

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/di...tive-blogging/

I just saw a video of a beaver making a dam in a doorway out of household items.