Here’s the thing, 6ix. I didn’t have to respond with “I’m embarrassing you”. In fact, I pop in here give a quick reply or two to you and then go about my day. Then you come in and over the course of a number of hours furiously type scatterbrained replies. The thing with the sentence “you’re embarrassing yourself” is usually the person isn’t even aware of the embarrassment. But not shocking you nitpicked that and took it literally.

And hey if it helps you sleep better at night feel free to think people in OOT are just forming their opinions on some group dynamic. It’s not reality, but that doesn’t seem to be where you reside anyway.

Maybe I am embarrassing myself here by even responding to your insanity.. I’m going to try to do better.

KingOfFelt, MadLibs World Champion 2023.

Now that that's out of the way:

Here are the relevant and important posts:

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=4154

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=4178

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=4345

It has already been explained to you that not everyone here is married to those numbers in that Time article. I posted it in regards to the PETA portion of it.

So that covers two of your posts.

I’ll let Chillrob answer the other as it was directed towards him although I am curious how you determined that malamutes and presa canarios were more dangerous than pitbulls? Was this based on some official registry?

That said, I’m not sure anyone else is interested in engaging you anymore even if you are as desperate for attention as you seem to be. I’m just a sucker, so I’ll give you these scraps and that will likely be it.

Setting aside the general idea that you all are married to the numbers even if you don't realize how or why (like, that's the entire point):



Lol you're such a ridiculous person.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scient...aws_of_physics

Or like, did you not know how and why chihuahuas are less dangerous than pit bulls?

My initial posts last week were replying to ArcherOfLoaf (i mean not really, for all i knew he left 2p2 altogether) and then you ran your mouth, lol, what gave you the impression I was horny to talk to a smoothbrain coward such as yourself? (you're right though, "babybrain pussy" is unbecoming of a gentleman such as myself)

You saw how quickly Phresh changed his mind. I didn't think there'd be anybody like you who would just keep going lol.

p.s. Lol wait,

it was not "directed towards him" in post #4353 man are you using GPT4.0 to come up with the dumbest possible replies?

haha that quote was from well over 3 years ago. I thought it was obvious when I said that I posted the Time article for the PETA reference that I was referring to the one I posted recently and that you literally quoted in your responses.

Regardless, no one here is married to those stats. There are plenty of others including some on pro-pitbull sites. I understand why you have to believe that we are married to those specific stats though because that is the basis of which most of your argument is predicated as highlighted by the fact that two of those three posts you referred to were specifically attacking that one source.

Oh man. I was so hoping you would say something like this because it just highlights how absolutely absurd and hypocritical your takes are.

You come in here crying for everyone to show you some sources that pitbulls are more dangerous than other dogs then make a claim like this without any sort of data backing it up and expect everyone to take you at your word.

Golden Retrievers are pretty big dogs. So in your mind they are more dangerous than any dog smaller than them and equally as dangerous as other dogs their size because herp derp physics?

I can feel the rage in this post. Maybe that's why you're all over the place. You're too emotional. Anyway:

A) You don't actually think Phresh changed his mind. Just another example of you being disingenuous.

B) I'm probably an idiot for trying to keep engaging you, yes. You'll notice not a single other soul has decided to respond to you recently. For a bit you had Chillrob trying to debate in good faith but it appears he quickly realized how useless that was. No one really wants to talk to you anymore.

I was referring to post #4178. You know, the one where you are quoting him and responding directly to him?

Like I said, no one really wants to talk to you anymore. You'll likely think this is an us problem and not a you problem, but I'll point out that your performance didn't go any better when you tried to start a pitbull thread in politics or when you were posting in this thread a number of years ago. Not sure why you thought this time would be any different.

Ding, ding, ding.

Yep. Fair.

yeah... that's... the point...

A wild babybrain appears.

Why's that? I mean, like, specifically.

I mean, whenever you're ready.

This dude might've pulled a "shoot the moon" and made a post so dumb and insane that there's no way to really reply to it.

It's like staring at an eclipse or a double rainbow or both at the same time.

30lb dogs fighting other 30lb dogs, that sounds bad!

Unlike {checks notes} war.

To be fair though, dogbitedotorg and animals247dotorg don't have any stats on these murderous greyhounds and mastiffs, so it's safe to assume zeroes across the board.

that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered hed gehog you ever set eyes on!

So it looks like seventeenth time's the charm then?

I need to know that, when I post some more, you're not going to come back and unleash another blackhole of stupidity. I'm still digesting the first one, that last post. If another blackhole of stupidity appears then the two blackholes of stupidity might collide and create gravitational waves of stupidity and the whole affair will be a mess.


Tbh "still digesting" is overstating it. I'm really still stuck on the first sentence:



For my own sense of sanity I need to be sure this actually happened:

Me: The whole dumb thing is based on those stats, they're what every article uses.

Dude: No way bro nobody uses those.

Me: The last decade of this thread is based on those shitty stats! Dude just posted the Time article the other day!

Dude: Yeah but I only posted it for the PETA quote.

Me: Ok, fine, sure, let's go with that (lol what a shitty liar). Dude posted this other article three years ago with the same shitty stats lol. It's shitty articles with those shitty stats all the way down.

Dude: Oh yeah, well, counterpoint: haha that is from well over 3 years ago!

.

6ix - it’s over. No one wants to talk to your disingenuous ass anymore lol You really struggle with taking a hint.

baby learned a new word WAIT


He changed his mind about debating, not about his side of the debate. For the purposes of this you actually are functionally illiterate, that's so wild.

In a way your meltdown here is amazing and pathetic at the same time. No more responses from me for a while though. I’m curious how long you’ll keep talking to yourself.

Anyhoo, this reddit,

https://www.reddit.com/r/BanPitBulls/

is ****ing LIT...

Look at this embarrassment of riches:

https://17barks.blogspot.com/



Imagine typing that lol. Let's see what kind of dog this thoughtful and clearheaded fellow owns.




Amazing.

heh

absolute ****ing goldfish brain lol