Quote:
Originally Posted by RigCT
Oh my I did not agree with that article at all.
"...it’s a hotchpotch of ill-informed prescriptivism, a mean-spirited rant about trivial linguistic errors, non-errors, and non-standard usages traditionally decried by hobbyist peevers."
Where I grew up, it is "hodgepodge". Maybe this is an acceptable alternative? Either way, seems like slang. Off to a rocky start imo.
"For example. Could care less isn’t wrong – it’s an idiomatic variant. ... Less for fewer isn’t wrong. Non-literal literally isn’t either (and has been used even in classic literature for literally centuries)."
I don't want to live in a world where "could care less" is accepted, when it all started as a sarcastic comment in The Breakfast Club. He is just wrong about "literally" too.
This article just makes me sad. Defending bad grammar--not a noble pursuit.
your a moran.
maybe you're a greater authority on the english language than thackeray, bronte, dickens, twain, joyce, and nabokov, but more likely you're just a narrow-minded prescriptivist, and a provincial one, at that. ["hotchpotch: noun, british 1. variant of hodgepodge."]