Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! "Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode!

12-16-2018 , 06:32 PM
Under the technical rules of grammar that I was taught, yes. You need the subordinating conjunction, or you have two independent clauses. That is no longer standard, though. Perhaps it remains for academic writing, but not for speech, fiction, etc.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-16-2018 , 11:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
Under the technical rules of grammar that I was taught, yes. You need the subordinating conjunction, or you have two independent clauses.
He does. So it's optional.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-16-2018 , 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cassette
I'm sorry to report that you nerds are woefully unaware of the atrocious state of Freshman writing. Those Dominic opening paragraphs are entirely unremarkable.
exactly
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-17-2018 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewOldGuy
He does. So it's optional.
Except that without the subordinating conjunction there is (formally) nothing linking those clauses. They are separate statements. Of course, I think that the linkage is obvious from context, but without the "that," I'm technically saying two separate things. "I think." "The linkage is obvious from context."

I don't know if this is one of the technical rules of grammar that is falling out of usage in formal writing. It certainly is in spoken English.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-17-2018 , 01:36 PM
I can live without the "that," but I wouldn't object to it being labeled an error.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-18-2018 , 03:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lastcardcharlie

I am never quite when it's correct to put "that" in, in such situations (whatever the grammatical term for them is).
Years ago, I challenged myself to remove "that" as often as I could. I'm not sure how that worked out....
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-18-2018 , 04:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cassette
I'm sorry to report that you nerds are woefully unaware of the atrocious state of Freshman writing. Those Dominic opening paragraphs are entirely unremarkable.
Man, what a tilting job.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-18-2018 , 05:43 AM
For real. I couldn't do it.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-18-2018 , 10:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveT
Years ago, I challenged myself to remove "that" as often as I could. I'm not sure how that worked out....
fyp
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 04:04 AM
The “I/me”, “he/him” confusion is rampant. Why does no one know the difference between nominative and accusative case?

I’m watching Designated Survivor, season 1, episode 6. President Kirkman (Kiefer Sutherland) says “What are the chances of having he and his wife over to the White House for dinner.” Am I the only person who finds this like an aural speedbump?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 07:55 AM
It's so strange. Almost no one gets those things wrong when it's just the pronoun. No writer would ever have the President say "What are the chances of having he over for dinner?" But add another person into the sentence and it's suddenly the most confusing thing ever.

I teach my students "just use whatever pronoun you would use if the other person weren't in the sentence," and they always look at me like it's a trick. "It can't be that simple," they seem to be thinking. "At any moment he's going to tell us about the exceptions."
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 12:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by W0X0F
The “I/me”, “he/him” confusion is rampant. Why does no one know the difference between nominative and accusative case?

I’m watching Designated Survivor, season 1, episode 6. President Kirkman (Kiefer Sutherland) says “What are the chances of having he and his wife over to the White House for dinner.” Am I the only person who finds this like an aural speedbump?
Perhaps it's simpler to use subjective, objective, and possessive for the English cases.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
It's so strange. Almost no one gets those things wrong when it's just the pronoun. No writer would ever have the President say "What are the chances of having he over for dinner?" But add another person into the sentence and it's suddenly the most confusing thing ever.

I teach my students "just use whatever pronoun you would use if the other person weren't in the sentence," and they always look at me like it's a trick. "It can't be that simple," they seem to be thinking. "At any moment he's going to tell us about the exceptions."
this what I tell them, too
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
this what I tell them, too
And still they get it wrong.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 02:50 PM
Do they look at you like you're trying to trick them into making rookie mistakes, too?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
Do they look at you like you're trying to trick them into making rookie mistakes, too?
Not usually, but it's been over seven years since I've taught freshmen comp. My colleagues tell me these students are different, but that's always been the case.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cole
Perhaps it's simpler to use subjective, objective, and possessive for the English cases.
Not sure I'm following you. If you mean I should use those terms rather than nominative and accusative, it really doesn't matter. It's not the terms being used that's causing the problem.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 06:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by W0X0F
Not sure I'm following you. If you mean I should use those terms rather than nominative and accusative, it really doesn't matter. It's not the terms being used that's causing the problem.
No, but few will recognize the accusative since it's not really used in English--or the nominative for that matter.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 06:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cole
No, but few will recognize the accusative since it's not really used in English--or the nominative for that matter.
Those few can make use of Google to fill in the gaps in their knowledge base. I could dumb it down but, again, that's missing the point here.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by W0X0F
Those few can make use of Google to fill in the gaps in their knowledge base. I could dumb it down but, again, that's missing the point here.
Hell, then why not throw in the ablative and the genitive as well? American students learn, or should learn, English case names. Then you can teach them about how to use pronouns correctly.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cole
Hell, then why not throw in the ablative and the genitive as well? American students learn, or should learn, English case names. Then you can teach them about how to use pronouns correctly.
Wow, John, you continue to misinterpret my post. I used those terms here. I did not approach someone and say "You're using the nominative case when the accusative case is appropriate." The terms I use here to complain about the problem have nothing to do with the misuse I observe. If I were to try to educate someone about their misuse then, yes, I would use the terms "subject" and "object." Are you happy now?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by W0X0F
Wow, John, you continue to misinterpret my post. I used those terms here. I did not approach someone and say "You're using the nominative case when the accusative case is appropriate." The terms I use here to complain about the problem have nothing to do with the misuse I observe. If I were to try to educate someone about their misuse then, yes, I would use the terms "subject" and "object." Are you happy now?
Delighted. I wasn't being a prick. It's hard enough teaching these sorts of things to students. Damn, they have trouble figuring out the one remaining case marker in English.

The original comment referenced hearing someone say "he" instead of "him." I don't give this kind of spoken hypercorrection a second thought. Students ought to get it right in written form, but despite the easy check, they still struggle.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cole
The original comment referenced hearing someone say "he" instead of "him." I don't give this kind of spoken hypercorrection a second thought. Students ought to get it right in written form, but despite the easy check, they still struggle.
I wish it didn't hit my ear the way it does. I don't pretend to be a grammar guru, but this and the widespread mistakes with the past perfect tense, have the same effect on me that I imagine a sour note would have on a musician or singer. It sets my teeth on edge. Obviously my problem, as it doesn't seem to bother almost anyone else.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cole
Hell, then why not throw in the ablative and the genitive as well? American students learn, or should learn, English case names. Then you can teach them about how to use pronouns correctly.
There is no ablative in English, is there?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
12-19-2018 , 08:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by W0X0F
I wish it didn't hit my ear the way it does. I don't pretend to be a grammar guru, but this and the widespread mistakes with the past perfect tense, have the same effect on me that I imagine a sour note would have on a musician or singer. It sets my teeth on edge. Obviously my problem, as it doesn't seem to bother almost anyone else.
Oh, no, it bothers me. But I have learned not to say anything. About fifteen years ago I noticed my students writing sentences like "I had wanted to tell him," confusing simple past and past perfect. I assumed the mistake came from spoken English, but I have never been sure.

This is amusing:

https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/ling...-say-had-went/
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote

      
m