"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! - Page 233 - Other Topics Forum - Discuss Pop Culture, Arts and Entertainment

Two Plus Two Forums 2+2 Communities Other Other Topics

"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode!

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 233 of 247

First

33 133 183 213 223 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 243

Last

Page 233 of 247

First

33 133 183 213 223 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 243

Last

12-11-2018 , 11:28 PM

#5801

John Cole

Lounge Nighthawk

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 18,190

Dave,

It's "should have," not "should of."

Quote

12-11-2018 , 11:31 PM

#5802

Dominic

Tripod

Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 74,268

all of those are "should have," Dave.

Just because we often pronounce it to sound like "of" doesn't mean that is, in fact, "of."

Quote

12-12-2018 , 12:06 AM

#5803

NewOldGuy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by daveT

Okay, I'll try to explain this. "Of" is used as an intensifier, similar to a double negative.

Actually no, "of" is never used that way.

But it was a creative argument to try to justify your phonetic substitution.

Last edited by NewOldGuy; 12-12-2018 at 12:14 AM.

Quote

12-12-2018 , 02:00 AM

#5804

W0X0F

sit back, relax, and enjoy the flight

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 5,830

Quote:

Originally Posted by daveT

I'm guessing the author in question wasn't using the device to it's fullest extent.

I'm starting to think you're just trolling this thread.

Quote

12-12-2018 , 02:02 AM

#5805

John Cole

Lounge Nighthawk

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 18,190

Quote:

Originally Posted by W0X0F

I'm starting to think you're just trolling this thread.

Nope. Dave's not a troll.

Quote

12-12-2018 , 06:33 AM

#5806

His Boy Elroy

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9,881

Quote:

Originally Posted by daveT

Okay, I'll try to explain this. "Of" is used as an intensifier, similar to a double negative.

For example:

"You shouldn't do that." -> You shouldn't do those things (could be in the past).

"You shouldn't of done that." -> You really should not do those things.

"You should of done none of it" -> You were being stupid doing those things.

"You should of done none of that" -> This is me lecturing you on what you shouldn't be doing.

"You shouldn't of done all that" -> You should not do those things, and now I'm irritated.

"You shouldn't of done none of it" -> You should not do those things. I'm angry, but I'll forgive you.

"You shouldn't of done none of that" -> You shouldn't do those things. I'm angry, and you aren't forgiven.

"You shouldn't of done none of all that" -> Incorrect speech, likely used as jesting hyperbole.

Conversely, "I should of studied for my test" is obviously "should have" but it has the intensity baked in. "I should'a studied for my test" has the same meaning but is less intense.

I'm guessing the author in question wasn't using the device to it's fullest extent.

Is this real life?

Quote

12-12-2018 , 08:46 AM

#5807

Garick

Oberbiergenießer

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 26,516

Quote:

Originally Posted by Didace

You shouldn't have tarded up the first Fred. Not nice.

Man, Didace really effed this poast up, right Dave?

Quote

12-12-2018 , 09:35 AM

#5808

Garick

Oberbiergenießer

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 26,516

All of this confusion seems to stem from our odd pronunciation of "of," probably to differentiate it from "off." (Parenthetically, I suspect that they come from the same root.) I lobby that we should go back to pronouncing the unvoiced labiodental fricitive, and pronounce "of" like "uf." That should be enough to differentiate it from "ahf."

Quote

12-12-2018 , 10:14 AM

#5809

John Cole

Lounge Nighthawk

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 18,190

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garick

Gilbert Sorrentino writes in one novel of "a nalectric light." Same thing with "should of." And as a former Catholic I recall trying to make sense of the sacrament "extra munction." (Extreme Unction for you non-Catholics.)

Quote

12-12-2018 , 01:59 PM

#5810

Garick

Oberbiergenießer

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 26,516

One of my friends' son asked if he could have an apple. Then after he ate it, he asked, "can I have another napple?" That was when my friend realized that to his son it was "a napple."

Quote

12-12-2018 , 05:49 PM

#5811

RussellinToronto

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,198

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garick

Thoughts on contractions in academic papers?

For a long time that was verboten, but PMLA, the flagship in English literary scholarship, changed their policy many years ago and I think most academic journals followed.

Quote

12-12-2018 , 05:59 PM

#5812

RussellinToronto

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,198

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Cole

I thought maybe it was only me, a Protestant in a Catholic school in grade 8, that had made that mistake!

Quote

12-12-2018 , 06:01 PM

#5813

Tom Ames

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 45,776

I should never of opened this thread.

Quote

12-12-2018 , 09:23 PM

#5814

Dominic

Tripod

Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 74,268

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Ames

I should never of opened this thread.

"uff" not "of."

Quote

12-13-2018 , 12:31 AM

#5815

Garick

Oberbiergenießer

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 26,516

Dave,

On the off chance that you're not trolling, let's take a look at your sentence "You should of done none of it." You are claiming that "of" is an intensifier. So there is no helping verb "have" in the sentence. In that case, why are you using the past participle of the main verb?

Let's say that the sentence wasn't so intense, would you really take out "of" and leave the rest the same. "You should done none of it?"

Does this convince you that the what you are discussing is just the helping verb "have" making the present perfect tense? It sounds like "of" because it is contracted. That is all. Seriously.

You should've known that already.

Quote

12-13-2018 , 12:39 AM

#5816

John Cole

Lounge Nighthawk

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 18,190

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garick

It sounds like "of" because it is contracted.

I assure you Dave isn't trolling. Also, people tend to pronounce "should have" as "should of" even when it's not contracted.

Quote

12-13-2018 , 11:04 PM

#5817

daveT

S.A.G.E. Master

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 23,955

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garick

No, not trolling. I truly don't see "should of" and "should have" as equal. I write "should have," but that has no connection to the connotations I would be using if I was speaking (I don't really speak this way these days).

For your example sentence, you could say "You should do none of that" to be more correct. That sentence works for past, presence, or future tenses. The sentence as I originally wrote doesn't imply something that happened in the past without context.

Quote

12-13-2018 , 11:16 PM

#5818

Didace

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 19,877

If daveT is trolling, it's awesome.

If he's not, it's awesome.

Quote

12-14-2018 , 05:44 AM

#5819

five4suited

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 9,026

Quote:

Originally Posted by W0X0F

I'm starting to think you're just trolling this thread.

right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Cole

Nope. Dave's not a troll.

but I know this to be true, Dave is a good guy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Didace

If daveT is trolling, it's awesome.

If he's not, it's awesome.

head asplode

I'm not sure what the conclusion will be, but I'm posting at 2am because I think "should of" could easily be in the thread title. My eye is twitching.

Quote

12-14-2018 , 07:33 AM

#5820

Louis Cyphre

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 11,025

You're "head" should of literally exploded!

Quote

12-14-2018 , 08:04 AM

#5821

Garick

Oberbiergenießer

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 26,516

Quote:

"You should do none of that" to be more correct. That sentence works for past, presence, or future tenses.

I can't even.

And you still haven't explained why you would use a past participle following "of."

Quote

12-14-2018 , 10:00 AM

#5822

John Cole

Lounge Nighthawk

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 18,190

Quote

12-14-2018 , 10:52 AM

#5823

NewOldGuy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre

You're "head" should of literally exploded!

Someone please update the thread title to include this.

Quote

12-14-2018 , 01:11 PM

#5824

NewOldGuy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by daveT

No, not trolling. I truly don't see "should of" and "should have" as equal.

They aren't, because there is no such phrase in English as "should of". Every time you thought you were saying that in your life, you were actually saying "should've."

Are you really still defending this?

Last edited by NewOldGuy; 12-14-2018 at 01:17 PM.