Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
I'm fine with them as long as it's not ridiculous, like "shouldnt've."
Or worse, they could have written "shouldn't of" or "should of", both of which I have seen printed in novels by top publishing houses.
I emailed one author about this and his response was "that's how they talk." I told him no, that's just how it sounds to you when they say the contraction for "should HAVE", but that definitely is not how it is spelled. He did not reply.
I understand there is some phonetic leeway accepted with dialogue, but not this.
Last edited by NewOldGuy; 12-10-2018 at 10:55 PM.