Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters

01-07-2021 , 04:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
meh. If you didn't like the time limit, you should have objected when he raised it.
Because someone from the NVG thread PM'd me for my opinion on this:

That would be a valid point before the bet was booked.
After booking, you have to explicitly confirm a request by the other party to change the terms. Everything that's not explicitly agreed on by both parties isn't part of the bet.

You can't just say "We agreed on 2:1 odds but now I feel like 20:1 is better" and proceed with those terms just because the other party didn't object.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 05:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
You put a crying child in a pit and the first animal to make it stop crying (by any means necessary) wins.

Let’s sell this idea to the Discovery channel and get rich!

Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
Because someone from the NVG thread PM'd me for my opinion on this:

That would be a valid point before the bet was booked.
After booking, you have to explicitly confirm a request by the other party to change the terms. Everything that's not explicitly agreed on by both parties isn't part of the bet.

You can't just say "We agreed on 2:1 odds but now I feel like 20:1 is better" and proceed with those terms just because the other party didn't object.

Very well said.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 06:12 AM
bc he booked the bet in nvg is there anyway that the ban can include that subforum too?

his drivel is grotesque.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by happy to be hear
bc he booked the bet in nvg is there anyway that the ban can include that subforum too?
You should ask a NVG mod about that.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
Because someone from the NVG thread PM'd me for my opinion on this:

That would be a valid point before the bet was booked.
After booking, you have to explicitly confirm a request by the other party to change the terms. Everything that's not explicitly agreed on by both parties isn't part of the bet.

You can't just say "We agreed on 2:1 odds but now I feel like 20:1 is better" and proceed with those terms just because the other party didn't object.
Fair enough. I am not conversant with prop-betting usage, but I can accept that. It just seems to me that this was more of a clarification attempt than a "change the agreement" attempt, since they didn't get in to time limits or what constituted acceptable proof before they posted "booked" and "confirmed."

I do agree that it is at best an angle, given that golf didn't bring it up until after he was wanting to buy out.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
Fair enough. I am not conversant with prop-betting usage, but I can accept that. It just seems to me that this was more of a clarification attempt than a "change the agreement" attempt, since they didn't get in to time limits or what constituted acceptable proof before they posted "booked" and "confirmed."

I do agree that it is at best an angle, given that golf didn't bring it up until after he was wanting to buy out.

There was inherently no time limit term involved with the wager that was officially made and accepted by both parties.

It simply wasn’t mentioned prior to the terms of the bet being accepted by both parties. Therefore a time limit is not part of the bet that was accepted by both parties.

This wasn’t a clarification. It was golfnutts attempt to add terms to the previously accepted wager. Those additional terms were not accepted and therefore irrelevant. This is more than an angle. This is golf trying to Welch on paying the bet he lost.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 02:05 PM
lol is golfnutt really going after Bighurt now? Bighurt is beyond reproach, he's a legit oot legend at this point imo.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 02:22 PM
BurgHurt is a legit oot legend I agree.

I am very happy and grateful to consider him a friend.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saklad
There was inherently no time limit term involved with the wager that was officially made and accepted by both parties.

It simply wasn’t mentioned prior to the terms of the bet being accepted by both parties. Therefore a time limit is not part of the bet that was accepted by both parties.

This wasn’t a clarification. It was golfnutts attempt to add terms to the previously accepted wager. Those additional terms were not accepted and therefore irrelevant. This is more than an angle. This is golf trying to Welch on paying the bet he lost.
The timeline also wasn't something reasonable. Although it would still require consent from BH, something like a few months down the line would be different
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 03:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kioshk
lol is golfnutt really going after Bighurt now? Bighurt is beyond reproach, he's a legit oot legend at this point imo.

Confirmed legend.

It must be something in the DNA of horrible posters. Look at Round boy for instance. He’s still trying to recover from his attempted dunk on bighurt almost a year ago.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnutt View Post
Bet expires at the end of the 2020. One of us has to show proof beyond a reasonable doubt. I am not waiting years for a wager to settle.

Leo, if you’re reading, turn off the VPN, post something convincing and I will give half of my winnings to the gofundme.
Trying to squeeze it in after the bet is booked as a certainty, rather than asking bh for a timeline is behavior of a sociopath.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdome
Trying to squeeze it in after the bet is booked as a certainty, rather than asking bh for a timeline is behavior of a sociopath.
Like someone who would say to a moderator: That's not gonna fly
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
BurgHurt is a legit oot legend I agree.

I am very happy and grateful to consider him a friend.
Likewise! OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnutt
I will go one by one with you here and show you why BigHurt52235 is a weasel, liar and should be permabanned.
yeah you gotta go, son


Spoiler:
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatthejish
CAPICHE.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundGuy
Tom, from a perfectly fake legal standpoint, there no longer seems to be a containment thread.

I need to tell Mrs. RG.
we make great plays *toilet flushing in the background* as a team

OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saklad
Look at Round boy for instance. He’s still trying to recover from his attempted dunk on bighurt almost a year ago.

LOLOLOL indeed
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saklad
He’s still trying to recover from his attempted dunk on bighurt almost a year ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
LOLOLOL indeed

My memory sucks. Wasn't that something about a cheddar brat?

In any case, I agree bighurt is a good dude. (wouldn't want him around my wife, but a good dude)
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 05:54 PM
Dodger put it best,

Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
Of all ****ing people to pick a fight with.

RG it's all good when it comes to me ftmp, but you really read the temperature of the room wrong. You can apologize but when, for no reason, you go after a nice guy who's not a pussy it doesn't usually go well.

We tend to have long memories.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 06:48 PM
True story, I just stumbled upon this thread thanks to a mention in the associated NVG thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnutt
There is a separate thread about this wager for those with low-IQs on 2+2 run by Biff Tannen and his pack of hyenas from ‘Back to the Future’.

These clowns changed the title of a thread there to make fun of me AND then immediately banned me. They let BigHurt52235 post in there and create more fake news.

Biff Tannen didn’t even read this thread. He had one of his minions put together a fake news synopsis.

This is the crew that created the poll. They stuffed it with their votes. They engaged in voter intimidation tactics.

Stop the Vote!
So now I'm literally reading it while popcorn is popping in the kitchen.

(Also, nice Cliff's by gregorio)
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 07:02 PM
LOLOLOL @ voter intimidation tactics

Yeah I was really intimidated when I voted.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 07:23 PM
27off, just to be clear. Golf isn't "exiled" where he can't even see OOT. He can see it, but if posts, you're going to nuke him, right?

That's some serious bait. I like it.

Btw, Free Tom.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 07:24 PM
Big,

You use cash app yet?
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundGuy
27off, just to be clear. Golf isn't "exiled" where he can't even see OOT. He can see it, but if posts, you're going to nuke him, right?

That's some serious bait. I like it.

Btw, Free Tom.

Correct, but I also just banned him a little while ago. CAPICHE?


If Tom is containing, he is self-containing. Mrs. RG on the other hand...
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
Big,

You use cash app yet?
I believe I have it.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote
01-07-2021 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
Correct, but I also just banned him a little while ago. CAPICHE?


If Tom is containing, he is self-containing. Mrs. RG on the other hand...
Temp-ban, you softie.

Mrs. RG seems not to care. No biggie.
OOT Containment Thread for very bad posters Quote

      
m